2012
DOI: 10.7156/v5i2p064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern and Evolution of C4d Staining of Ischemic Myocardial Injury: Implications for the Interpretation of Post-Transplant Endomyocardial Biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a recent study reported that immunohistochemical staining was strongly positive for C4d antigen along the microvasculature and in cardiomyocytes with contraction band necrosis in a fatal case of takotsubo cardiomyopathy, in which myocardial injury appears to be due to excessive circulating catecholamines (as occurs in cases of pheochromocytoma) 36. Finally, it should be noted that, according to some authors, cases in which supposedly necrotic cardiomyocytes test negative for C4d should be interpreted as cases of artifactual contraction band injury 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a recent study reported that immunohistochemical staining was strongly positive for C4d antigen along the microvasculature and in cardiomyocytes with contraction band necrosis in a fatal case of takotsubo cardiomyopathy, in which myocardial injury appears to be due to excessive circulating catecholamines (as occurs in cases of pheochromocytoma) 36. Finally, it should be noted that, according to some authors, cases in which supposedly necrotic cardiomyocytes test negative for C4d should be interpreted as cases of artifactual contraction band injury 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility of C4d deposition to detect early myocardial infarction may help in the interpretation of perioperative ischemic injury [11,22]. The intensity of microvascular C4d staining may differ during humoral rejection as compared with myocardial infarction alone [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%