2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient specific stress and rupture analysis of ascending thoracic aneurysms

Abstract: An ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) is a serious medical condition which, more often than not, requires surgery. Aneurysm diameter is the primary clinical criterion for determining when surgical intervention is necessary but, biomechanical studies have suggested that the diameter criterion is insufficient. This manuscript presents a method for obtaining the patient specific wall stress distribution of the ATAA and the retrospective rupture risk for each patient. Five human ATAAs and the preoperative d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 d-f) consistently revealed strain localizing in the rupture region preceding failure, confirming the observations reported in [26]. Dynamic-CT scans collected prior to surgery were used to create patient-specific finite element models for Patients 2, 4, 5, and 6 [33]. The results show that the wall tensions and strains observed at rupture exceed those expected in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…1 d-f) consistently revealed strain localizing in the rupture region preceding failure, confirming the observations reported in [26]. Dynamic-CT scans collected prior to surgery were used to create patient-specific finite element models for Patients 2, 4, 5, and 6 [33]. The results show that the wall tensions and strains observed at rupture exceed those expected in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As our community moves forward to more patient-based geometries and simulations involving realistic geometries that necessarily lead to complex stress fields, validation of models in multidimensional loading is crucial. For example, it is common [62][63][64][65][66] to report results in terms of principal stresses, which are informative but do not address the fact that a stress acting radially or in shear is more likely to lead to tissue failure than one acting circumferentially. Martin et al [65] used a potentially generalizable energy-based failure threshold, but they based the failure criterion on uniaxial circumferential tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental set-up and the bulge inflation tests performed by our group are explained in details in previous publications [27,28,34]. The aim of the present study is to review the failure properties (maximum stress, maximum stretch) obtained by the bulge inflation test and compare them with failure properties obtained by uniaxial testing.…”
Section: Materials For Bulge Inflation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group recently conducted bulge inflation tests on human ATAA tissues [26][27][28], to test media/adventitia samples as well as complete layers. Stereo-digital image correlation (SDIC) was used to obtain the strain field of the entire inflated membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%