2021
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Specific Dose Estimates in Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Examination

Abstract: The study aimed to implement realistic source models of a computed tomography (CT) scanner and Monte Carlo simulations to actual patient data and to calculate patient-specific organ and effective dose estimates for patients undergoing dynamic CT myocardial perfusion examinations. Source models including bowtie filter, tube output and x-ray spectra were determined for a dual-source Siemens Somatom Definition Flash scanner. Twenty CT angiography patient datasets were merged with a scaled International Commission… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bowtie filter, spectra and helical scan exposure geometry), material conversion, and the anthropomorphic phantom model. According to a previous study with similar methodology, the maximum difference between dose measurement and simulation results was found to be around 15% as applied to phantom data with ImpactMC program incorporating bowtie filter and spectra models [49]. Higher uncertainties can be anticipated if simulations are performed for clinical patient data with individual morphology, organ locations and shapes.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 92%
“…bowtie filter, spectra and helical scan exposure geometry), material conversion, and the anthropomorphic phantom model. According to a previous study with similar methodology, the maximum difference between dose measurement and simulation results was found to be around 15% as applied to phantom data with ImpactMC program incorporating bowtie filter and spectra models [49]. Higher uncertainties can be anticipated if simulations are performed for clinical patient data with individual morphology, organ locations and shapes.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 92%