2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Reported Voice and Speech Outcomes After Whole-Neck Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: Prospective Longitudinal Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
40
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there are little studies that evaluated VHI scores after CCRT treatment for HNC, especially at long term. In recent studies that evaluated voice quality, results showed decreases in voice quality following CCRT [6,40], with an impact on QoL and emotional distress [42]. Though almost the whole VHI range (0-91) was covered in our patient population (with various tumor sites included) at 6 years post-treatment, the median total VHI score was only three.…”
Section: Voice Qualitymentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To date, there are little studies that evaluated VHI scores after CCRT treatment for HNC, especially at long term. In recent studies that evaluated voice quality, results showed decreases in voice quality following CCRT [6,40], with an impact on QoL and emotional distress [42]. Though almost the whole VHI range (0-91) was covered in our patient population (with various tumor sites included) at 6 years post-treatment, the median total VHI score was only three.…”
Section: Voice Qualitymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Previously, only few studies with adequate pre-treatment data prospectively investigated effects of CCRT on voice quality, and the available studies often used different diagnostic tests [9-11, 34, 36]. Longest follow-up was a year in all, except for the study of Vainshtein et al [6] that evaluated voice changes up to 2 years following CCRT. However, only patient-reported voice quality was assessed in that study, while especially acoustic voice parameters at long-term follow-up would be informative, since changes in voice quality (i.e., more nasality) after 6 years of follow-up are demonstrable in our study.…”
Section: Voice Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations