2009
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.147090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient ratings of spasticity during daily activities are only marginally associated with long-term surface electromyography

Abstract: Patient ratings of the level of spasticity appear poorly associated with spasticity in terms of involuntary muscle activity assessed with long-term sEMG recordings. It is likely that other factors such as pain and cognitions are also incorporated in these patient ratings. Clinicians are therefore strongly advised to perform complementary objective assessments using long-term sEMG recordings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spasticity is a multidimensional phenomenon, 32,35,36 therefore it is important that a combination of selfreported perceptions and objective measures is considered when assessing spasticity or changes in spasticity due to treatment. 24,32 This study addressed the lack of characterized associations among measures of involuntary muscle activity and the impact of spasticity on transfers and ADLs in general by investigating relationships among spasm duration and magnitude during transfers, perceived impact of spasticity on ADLs, and clinically-rated spasticity severity. Even though extensor spasticity is often reported to interfere with ADLs, 2,8-10 we found no significant relationships between problematic impact scores and quadriceps spasm duration or magnitude measured with EMG or clinically-rated extensor spasticity measured with the SCATS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spasticity is a multidimensional phenomenon, 32,35,36 therefore it is important that a combination of selfreported perceptions and objective measures is considered when assessing spasticity or changes in spasticity due to treatment. 24,32 This study addressed the lack of characterized associations among measures of involuntary muscle activity and the impact of spasticity on transfers and ADLs in general by investigating relationships among spasm duration and magnitude during transfers, perceived impact of spasticity on ADLs, and clinically-rated spasticity severity. Even though extensor spasticity is often reported to interfere with ADLs, 2,8-10 we found no significant relationships between problematic impact scores and quadriceps spasm duration or magnitude measured with EMG or clinically-rated extensor spasticity measured with the SCATS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[8][9][10] Many researchers have advocated for spasticity research to focus on its problematic aspects, 8,11,20,21 however few physiological measures of spasticity that are relevant to ADLs exist, especially for non-ambulatory individuals. A small number of studies 19,[22][23][24] have used electromyographic (EMG) recordings from leg muscles paralyzed by SCI to measure involuntary muscle spasms during ADLs. EMG and other measures of involuntary muscle activity fall within the physiological or "body functions" domain of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning in Disability and Health (ICF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, complaint of frequent spasms or high tone, may indicate a need for interventions to reduce spasm duration or intensity, respectively. Interpretation of self-reported scores must also acknowledge that up to half of individuals with SCI find spasticity to be advantageous (Lechner et al, 2006 ), and many people develop strategies to cope with it (Yang et al, 1991 ; Voerman et al, 2009 ). If we are to capture a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities of spasticity, its effects on function, and targets for treatment, self-report measures must be coupled with functional analyses and measurement of the underlying biology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there was a weak association between long-term sEMG recordings (i.e. number and duration of burst) during ADLs and self-reported level of spasticity [ 172 ]. The subjective component and lack of reliability in reporting spasticity using the Ashworth scale have been pinpointed as a possible confounding factor in establishing a clear relation between sEMG properties and spasticity [ 173 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%