1966
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1966.03110080063020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Protection in Cancer Chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haynes and Hench were the first to use a mobile plastic film isolation unit, and showed a reduction in crossinfection in the treatment of burns (Haynes and Hench, 1965). Schwartz and Perry (1966) later demonstrated the suitability of the same plastic isolator for cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy. The human maintenance isolation unit used here (Barnes et al, 1968d) was first tested with germ-free animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haynes and Hench were the first to use a mobile plastic film isolation unit, and showed a reduction in crossinfection in the treatment of burns (Haynes and Hench, 1965). Schwartz and Perry (1966) later demonstrated the suitability of the same plastic isolator for cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy. The human maintenance isolation unit used here (Barnes et al, 1968d) was first tested with germ-free animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By improving the efficacy of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy and minimizing the suffering caused by its side effects, this study contributes to the advancement of humanistic care for patients undergoing chemotherapy and brings attention to the field of chemotherapy protection (Scheme 1 ). 28 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibiotics used for decontamination are administered orally and are not or only minimally absorbed from the digestive tract. The antibiotics employed for decontamination in man are sometimes selected on the basis of a sensitivity test (Gunn & Gould, 1965) but are often selected without prior information concerning the sensitivity pattern of the patient's microflora and are supplied in empirical dosages (Schwartz & Perry, 1966;Bodey, Loftis & Bowen, 1968;Preisler, Goldstein & Henderson, 1970). In our laboratory, decontamination of animals is always preceded by a sensitivity test on their faecal microflora (van de Waaij, de Vries & Lekkerkerk, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%