Patient experience feedback in UK hospitals: What types are available and what are their potential roles in quality improvement (QI)?

Abstract

Background & objectives The comparative uses of different types of patient experience (PE) feedback as data within quality improvement (QI) are poorly understood. This paper reviews what types are currently available and categorizes them by their characteristics in order to better understand their roles in QI. Methods A scoping review of types of feedback currently available to hospital staff in the UK was undertaken. This comprised academic database searches for “measures of PE outcomes” (2000‐2016), and grey literature and websites for all types of “PE feedback” potentially available (2005‐2016). Through an iterative consensus process, we developed a list of characteristics and used this to present categories of similar types. Main results The scoping review returned 37 feedback types. A list of 12 characteristics was developed and applied, enabling identification of 4 categories that help understand potential use within QI—(1) Hospital‐initiated (validated) quantitative surveys: for example the NHS Adult Inpatient Survey; (2) Patient‐initiated qualitative feedback: for example complaints or twitter comments; (3) Hospital‐initiated qualitative feedback: for example Experience Based Co‐Design; (4) Other: for example Friends & Family Test. Of those routinely collected, few elicit “ready‐to‐use” data and those that do elicit data most suitable for measuring accountability, not for informing ward‐based improvement. Guidance does exist for linking collection of feedback to QI for some feedback types in Category 3 but these types are not routinely used. Conclusion If feedback is to be used more frequently within QI, more attention must be paid to obtaining and making available the most appropriate types.

Seldom heard voices: a meta-narrative systematic review of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples healthcare experiences

“…These practices allowed participants to feel more comfortable in sharing their experiences, enriching the data. Evidence of the need to consider a range of methods for capturing patient experience dependent on the purpose served indicates that diversity in the methods used is valuable to ensure the data is useable and useful [ 22 ].…”

“…Substantial differences in beliefs around health and well-being apparent between and within Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations may therefore not be fully considered in current health system experience surveys in Australia [ 1 , 3 – 5 ]. Increasingly, there is interest and recognition of the need to capture more nuanced and patient-centred data of experiences; that is to collect experience data about what the patient or carer identifies as an important part of their experience, specifically with a focus to what they would like to see improved [ 20 – 22 ].…”

Perceptions of people with respiratory problems on physician performance evaluation—A qualitative study

“…Some patients can provide feedback on processes and outcomes of care, aiding quality improvement. Formal patient feedback on service delivery can for instance induce physicians' learning and likewise improve the care delivered . It is, however, paramount to not only ask patients to provide feedback on care received but to invite patients to collaborate with policymakers and medical content experts on quality guidelines or new implementations …”

Please like, follow, subscribe, and share

“…On the other hand, patients and families may increasingly be turning to social media to express concerns about the nature and quality of care they received. Such information can be used to inform improvements in care delivery by “closing the communication loop” . Consequently, it may be attractive to use social media as a “listening device” to monitor patients' perceptions on the quality of care provided.…”

“…Such information can be used to inform improvements in care delivery by "closing the communication loop". 3 Consequently, it may be attractive to use social media as a "listening device" to monitor patients' perceptions on the quality of care provided. On a population level, social media is also being explored as a data source for surveillance efforts aimed at identifying disease conditions of public health concern.…”