2005
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient dosimetry in diagnostic and interventional radiology: a practical approach using trigger levels

Abstract: Patient dosimetry is performed in radiology and interventional radiology to assess whether deterministic injuries may occur and to establish the risk of stochastic effects. A fundamental problem for patient dosimetry is that no single quantity can be used to accurately assess both the risk of stochastic effects and whether deterministic injuries will occur following a specific examination or procedure. In cardiology and interventional radiology, two different approaches to patient dosimetry are commonly used. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For interventional units on which an assessment of CAK is not fitted, the DAP reading could provide an alternative option (van de Putte et al 2000, Karambatsakidou et al 2005, Faulkner et al 2006, Chida et al 2006, Domienik et al 2008, Bogaert et al 2009. Results for patient data collection show a clear link between CESD and DAP for particular types of procedure (figures 5 and 6), as has been found in other cardiology studies Rogers 2006b, Žontar et al 2010).…”
Section: Cesd and Dapmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For interventional units on which an assessment of CAK is not fitted, the DAP reading could provide an alternative option (van de Putte et al 2000, Karambatsakidou et al 2005, Faulkner et al 2006, Chida et al 2006, Domienik et al 2008, Bogaert et al 2009. Results for patient data collection show a clear link between CESD and DAP for particular types of procedure (figures 5 and 6), as has been found in other cardiology studies Rogers 2006b, Žontar et al 2010).…”
Section: Cesd and Dapmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…But is has also been suggested for use in interventional cardiology [15]. Others [16][17][18] have also suggested using P KA as an indicator for high skin doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This program uses a significant dose (reference point dose of 5 Gy for coronary procedures) as an action trigger for additional documentation and followup, which is designed to set low enough dose value to minimize the probability of missing a clinical deterministic injury. Similarly, Faulkner et al proposed trigger levels for different interventional cardiology procedures based on different field sizes (DAP trigger level ranges from 20 to 400 Gy × cm 2 corresponding to field size from 10 to 200 cm 2 ), which may be used to identify patients at the risk of deterministic injuries [93]. …”
Section: Radiation-induced Risks To Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%