Patient-centered communication in digital medical encounters

Abstract

Objective Patients are increasingly using the secure messaging function available through online patient portals to communicate with their health care providers, yet little is known about the characteristics of conversations that occur. The goal of this study is to describe the types of messages initiated by patients communicating via patient portals and to assess whether providers employ patient-centered strategies in their electronic responses. Design A total of 193 messages from 58 message threads between patients and providers were collected during a one-week period in a large health care system. Methods Content analysis of patient messages was conducted and deductive analysis of provider responses was employed for two types of patient-centered communication, provider use of supportive talk and partnership building. Results Patients sent nearly double the number of messages compared to providers (65% versus 35%). Patient messages expressed concern, sought medical solutions and requested assistance with administrative tasks. Over half (53.4%) of provider replies did not contain language reflective of either partnership building or supportive talk. Conclusion Partnership building language and supportive talk occurred at lower rates than documented in the literature on in-person encounters. This may represent a lost opportunity to strengthen the patient-provider relationship. Practice Implications As secure messaging is increasingly utilized as a form of patient-provider communication, it is important to understand how aspects of this communication channel, including the patient-centeredness of the language used by providers, impact patient-provider relationships and patient outcomes.

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences of Patient-Professional Communication Over Patient Portals: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

“…Experiences related to health care professionals’ work were divided into 5 subthemes, which related to the increased workload [ 39 , 41 , 42 , 44 - 48 , 50 ], more efficient work [ 42 , 44 , 47 , 48 , 50 , 51 ], experiences of fear and discomfort [ 41 , 43 , 46 , 49 , 50 ], increased awareness of patients’ situations [ 41 , 43 , 48 ], and lack of time and expertise required for portal communication [ 42 , 43 , 50 ].…”

Facebook as a Medium for the Support and Enhancement of Ambulatory Care for People With Diabetes: Qualitative Realist Evaluation of a Real-World Trial

“…Online interaction between patients and providers has previously been shown to be problematic, with a discrepancy between the concerns being voiced by patients and the nature of replies being provided by HCPs, particularly in regard to the use of inclusive and supportive language [ 39 ]. Interviews with HCPs indicated that there were concerns about finding the right tone in potential online communication with people with diabetes, especially in the absence of social cues that they would use to tailor their communication and advice in face-to-face encounters.…”

OpenNotes in oncology: oncologists’ perceptions and a baseline of the content and style of their clinician notes

“…Our knowledge of best practices for PCC in the electronic age is emerging. Yet, we do know that when patients are able to conduct a dialogue with providers using secure messaging, few providers responded using PCC practices [65]. However, advocates of OpenNotes report that patient's access to notes facilitates their ability to share information with care partners, correct mistakes, and partner with providers [66].…”