2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-attentive sequential strategy for perimetry-based visual field acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also agrees with the aforementioned observation that the Pearson correlation between visual field thresholds at different locations are very high. A larger artificial neural network, such as the ones used in more complicated algorithms [ 21 ], may provide a better performance, but defeats the practicality of a simple and robust method. Similarly, we have also tried ensembled-based methods, such as random forest and gradient boosting, which also has the capability to reduce overfitting, but they did not offer superior performance than TTPCR and PLS, and took much longer to train.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also agrees with the aforementioned observation that the Pearson correlation between visual field thresholds at different locations are very high. A larger artificial neural network, such as the ones used in more complicated algorithms [ 21 ], may provide a better performance, but defeats the practicality of a simple and robust method. Similarly, we have also tried ensembled-based methods, such as random forest and gradient boosting, which also has the capability to reduce overfitting, but they did not offer superior performance than TTPCR and PLS, and took much longer to train.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tackle this issue explicitly by imposing a very low return to actions that have already affected the agent's state, whereby forcing the policy to assign them zero probability. Formally, we impose π(s, a t ) = 0 if a t ∈ A asked,t−1 as in Kucur et al (2019).…”
Section: Masked Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the third step, we use Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) (King-Smith et al 1994) method to estimate the sensitivity threshold at each location. Our approach differs from recent works, such as Patient-Adaptive Sampling Strategy (PASS) (Kucur et al 2019), which only selects a predefined number of locations to be tested. Our method optimizes the entire visual field testing sequence and shows improved test accuracy compared to PASS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this trade-off between speed and accuracy, previous research has either proposed reducing the testing duration by testing only a selected number of locations (Kucur and Sznitman 2017;Kucur et al 2019) or predicting the sensitivity threshold values (Shon, Sung, and Shin 2022;Park, Kim, and Lee 2019). In our work, we adopt a unique approach by using potential-based reward shaping to strike a balance between speed and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%