Patient and caregiver perspectives on early identification for advance care planning in primary healthcare settings

Abstract

Background: As part of a broader study to improve the capacity for advance care planning (ACP) in primary healthcare settings, the research team set out to develop and validate a computerized algorithm to help primary care physicians identify individuals at risk of death, and also carried out focus groups and interviews with relevant stakeholder groups. Interviews with patients and family caregivers were carried out in parallel to algorithm development and validation to examine (1) views on early identification of individuals at risk of deteriorating health or dying; (2) views on the use of a computerized algorithm for early identification; and (3) preferences and challenges for ACP. Methods: Fourteen participants were recruited from two Canadian provinces. Participants included individuals aged 65 and older with declining health and self-identified caregivers of individuals aged 65 and older with declining health. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone. A qualitative descriptive analytic approach was employed, which focused on summarizing and describing the informational contents of the data. Results: Participants supported the early identification of patients at risk of deteriorating health or dying. Early identification was viewed as conducive to planning not only for death, but for the remainder of life. Participants were also supportive of the use of a computerized algorithm to assist with early identification, although limitations were recognized. While participants felt that having family physicians assume responsibility for early identification and ACP was appropriate, questions arose around feasibility, including whether family physicians have sufficient time for ACP. Preferences related to the content of and approach to ACP discussions were highly individualized. Required supports during ACP include informational and emotional supports. Conclusions: This work supports the role of primary care providers in the early identification of individuals at risk of deteriorating health or death and the process of ACP. To improve ACP capacity in primary healthcare settings, compensation systems for primary care providers should be adjusted to ensure appropriate compensation and to accommodate longer ACP appointments. Additional resources and more established links to community organizations and services will also be required to facilitate referrals to relevant community services as part of the ACP process.

How family physicians introduce palliative care to patients with chronic illnesses

“…These included physician-dependent uptake (often related to comfort and experience), demands on time, lack of compensation/value for the work, and limited practical resources. [25][26][27] There was one area in particular where our findings differed from what has been recently published. The majority of our study participants indicated that it should be the responsibility of the FP to initiate palliative conversations, however, many studies have found that FPs prefer patients/families to begin these discussions.…”

“…These included physician-dependent uptake (often related to comfort and experience), demands on time, lack of compensation/value for the work, and limited practical resources. 25–27…”

Medical artificial intelligence ethics: A systematic review of empirical studies

“…Almost all studies were conducted based on data from Western countries, with the most from the USA. Other countries included Canada, 39 , 40 the UK, 22 , 34 , 41 , 42 France, 27 , 38 , 43 Denmark, 36 , 44 Germany, 33 Spain, 35 and Australia. 28 One study collected data from both North America and Asia, 45 and another study included data from three European countries (Switzerland, Germany, and Italy).…”

Understanding patient views and experiences of the IDENTIfication of PALLiative care needs (IDENTI-PALL): a qualitative interview study

“…These findings are consistent with previous research into patient views of identification tools, which reported their use could be beneficial when used with empathy and alongside the personal and clinical judgement of healthcare professionals. 23 – 25 …”