A progressive strength-training program is feasible for HNC survivors on and following treatment and is associated with improved acute and chronic fitness outcomes and symptom management.

This study examined the benefits of incorporating screening for distress as a routine part of care for patients with head and neck and neurologic cancers in a tertiary cancer center. Using a comparative 2-cohort pre-post implementation sequential design, consecutive outpatients with head and neck and neurologic cancers were recruited into 2 separate cohorts. Cohort 1 included patients attending clinics during April 2010, before the implementation of the screening program. The program was then implemented and patients completed the Screening for Distress Minimum Dataset (the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS] and the Canadian Problem Checklist [CPC]) at each clinic visit. Cohort 2 included patients attending clinics during March 2011. Consenting patients completed screening and outcome measures (ESAS, CPC, and either the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain or the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck). A total of 146 patients (78 head and neck and 68 neurologic) provided data for Cohort 1, and 143 (81 head and neck and 62 neurologic) provided data for Cohort 2. Compared with Cohort 1, patients with neurologic cancers in Cohort 2 reported significantly higher scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General total and emotional quality of life subscale; fewer high scores (≥ 4) on the ESAS breathlessness item; and fewer problems with fears/worries, frustration/anger, finding meaning in life, and worry about friends/family. Head and neck patients in Cohort 2 reported significantly higher emotional quality of life and fewer problems with eating and weight than those in Cohort 1. Although no definitive causal attributions can be made, patients exposed to routine screening for distress reported better well-being and fewer emotional, physical, and practical problems than historical controls.

advance, auto-populating the templates for the nurses, and creating summary pages for physicians. ConclusionsThe results suggest ways in which scps could help to improve the transition to cancer survivorship and provide starting points for larger feasibility studies.

88 Background: Despite known benefits, cancer care systems struggle to provide early, integrated palliative care (PC). Previously, we identified barriers to providing early PC as perceived by gastrointestinal oncology clinicians in Alberta, Canada (top barrier: time/competing priorities). Here, we expand on the previous study to better understand barriers to early PC for clinicians working with all tumor groups across Alberta. Methods: A 33-item survey was emailed to oncology clinicians in Alberta between November 2017 - January 2018. Questions were informed by Michie’s Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and queried (a) providing PC in oncology clinics, (b) referral to specialist PC consultation, and (c) working with PC consultants and homecare. Results: Respondents (n = 268) were nurses (42%), physicians (25%), and allied health professionals (20%). Barriers most frequently identified were "patients’ negative perceptions of PC” (68%), “my limited time/competing priorities” (66%), and "capability to manage patients’", social (65%) and spiritual (63%) concerns. These factors map to all three BCW domains: motivation, opportunity, and capability. In contrast, least frequently identified barriers were in clinician’s own motivation, e.g. perceived benefits of PC. There were few significant differences in response by tumor group or profession (χ2 test, responses coded: disagree [1-3], neutral [4], agree [5-7]). Most notably, tumor groups differed in their perception that “the criteria for PC services are too restrictive” (p = 0.003), while nurses and allied staff reported that patients’ negative perception of PC is a barrier more frequently than physicians (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Surveying across clinicians and tumor groups using Michie’s TDF/BCW revealed that the challenges to an early integrated PC approach include all three sources of behavior, though not equally for all clinicians. Determining this has allowed us to tailor multifaceted interventions, e.g. tip sheets to enhance capability, re-framing PC with patients, and earlier secondary PC nursing access, to enhance clinicians use and patients benefit from an early PC approach.

Objective Increasing numbers of Canadians living with complex, life-limiting conditions demand high-quality palliative care. Timely access to palliative care can help to reduce stress, improve quality of life, and provide relief for patients and their families. The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of family physicians (FPs) regarding the decision and process of introducing palliative care to patients with chronic diseases. Methods Interpretive description methodology was used to guide the investigation of the research question. Thirteen Calgary Zone FPs participated in individual interviews. Data was collected iteratively and analyzed using constant comparative analysis. Results Analysis of interviews identified the overarching themes of dignity and empowerment, which describe the experience of FPs introducing palliative care to chronically ill patients. Four subthemes were woven throughout, including the art of conversation, therapeutic relationships, timing, and preparation of the patient and family. Discussion While the benefits of palliative conversations are widely accepted, a deeper understanding of how FPs can be supported in developing this aspect of their practice is needed. Understanding their experience provides knowledge that can serve as a framework for future education, mentorship, and competency development.

e24097 Background: Timely palliative care interventions can help to alleviate the distress people experience after a diagnosis of an incurable, life-threatening cancer. However, referrals to palliative care continue to be late due to various provider and patient barriers. The Palliative Care Early and Systematic (PaCES)-Automatic study was co-designed with patients and providers and implemented an early palliative care intervention for newly diagnosed stage IV non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to determine patient/caregiver-reported acceptability of a phone call from a supportive and palliative care (SPC) nurse offering consultation, automatically (without referral) after first oncologist appointment. Methods: Two SPC specialist nurses screened out-patient clinic lists at a tertiary cancer center weekly and called all eligible patients offering an in-home consultation. Eligibility: > 18 years, newly diagnosed/suspected Stage IV NSCLC and had first medical/radiation oncologist visit. Patients/caregivers were surveyed about the acceptability (5-point Likert scale) of the automatic phone call offering a palliative care consult, using Sekhon’s Framework of Acceptability domains. Results: Among the 113 patients screened, 81 patients/caregivers were contacted and offered SPC consultation and 72% accepted the in-home consult. Of 70 patients/caregivers that agreed to be contacted for the survey: 4 did not recall the call offering SPC, 3 declined participating in the survey, and 15 were not reached. Of 48 respondents, 93.6% rated overall acceptability of the automatic call offering SPC consultation somewhat/completely acceptable, with the other 6.4% rating it as neither acceptable nor unacceptable. Of 35 patients/caregivers that completed the full survey: 31% caregivers, 63% female, 57% ≤65 years, 29% ≤high school education, 67% (n = 27) < $60,000 household income, 80% spoke only English/French, and 71% Caucasian. Within the domains of acceptability, 94.7% were comfortable receiving the call, 91.9% understood why they received it; 86.5% thought the call was a valuable; 69.5% thought the call helped them; 65.7% learned about SPC from the call; no one expressed concern that the SPC nurse had access to their contact/health information; 97.2% thought the call didn’t take much physical/emotional effort and were confident in their ability to participate (ask questions/make decisions). Conclusions: Nearly all patients/caregivers found the automatic SPC call offering consultation to be acceptable. Most patients agreed to the consultation offer. Routine calls offering SPC consultation may be a timely alternative to awaiting conventional referral by oncologists.

Background No standardized measures specifically assess cancer survivors' and healthcare providers' experience