2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09824-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathways to academic entrepreneurship: the determinants of female scholars’ entrepreneurial intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contributes to shedding light on the importance of university support in academic entrepreneurship, especially under the gender lens. This may have important implications, both theoretical and practical, to address the disadvantaged situation of female entrepreneurs within the academic context (Di Paola, 2020) and in the entrepreneurship field in general (Acs et al, 2011;Jennings & Brush, 2013). It will contribute also to the entrepreneurial ecosystem literature by providing evidence of the empowering role of university support and the increasingly central role played by universities as entrepreneurship enablers and discrimination inhibitors (Foss et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This contributes to shedding light on the importance of university support in academic entrepreneurship, especially under the gender lens. This may have important implications, both theoretical and practical, to address the disadvantaged situation of female entrepreneurs within the academic context (Di Paola, 2020) and in the entrepreneurship field in general (Acs et al, 2011;Jennings & Brush, 2013). It will contribute also to the entrepreneurial ecosystem literature by providing evidence of the empowering role of university support and the increasingly central role played by universities as entrepreneurship enablers and discrimination inhibitors (Foss et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Feminist theories have suggested as an explanation that women are characterized by either lower resource endowment and discrimination (liberal feminist theory) that prevent their business to grow or different attributes and aspirations (social feminist theory), which lead them to consider an alternative measure of business success (Fischer et al, 1993). Entrepreneurship literature, instead, in explaining the causes of the different rates and success of women entrepreneurship has focused on multiple archetypes of entrepreneurial ecosystems, such as policies (Foss et al, 2019;Terjesen et al, 2016), culture (Bardasi et al, 2011;Hechavarría & Brieger, 2022;Hechavarría et al, 2017), financial resources (Lauto et al, 2022) social capital and networks (Neumeyer et al, 2019), and universities (Di Paola, 2020;Rodríguez-Gulías et al, 2018;Shane et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We cannot presume that there are no variations among groups of women and a more in‐depth analysis of a subgroup of women can be conducted to gain further insights into this topic. For example, Di Paola (2020) examines the determinants of female scholars’ entrepreneurial intentions. Meanwhile, hybrid entrepreneurship in this study is also explored without taking into account its heterogeneity such as solo entrepreneurship and team startup.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative papers within this sample explored women's different pathways into AE (Di Paola, 2021) and the direct and indirect multilevel (individual, institutional and national levels) influences upon AE engagement (Dohse et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Stem Women Academic Entrepreneursmentioning
confidence: 99%