2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogens and disease vectors/hosts monitoring in aquatic environments: Potential of using eDNA/eRNA based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the sea turtle species‐specific research possible with the methodologies established in this study, it is also possible to extend these genetic analysis tools further to include the investigation and monitoring of threats to these vulnerable animals (Amarasiri et al, 2021; Diaz‐Ferguson & Moyer, 2014; Farrell, Yetsko, et al, 2021; Huver et al, 2015; Miaud et al, 2019; Sengupta et al, 2019). Given that eDNA extraction recovered DNA from all organisms/pathogens present (shed DNA or microbes themselves) there is significant potential to simultaneously monitor wildlife and their pathogens from the same eDNA sample (Alfaro‐Nunez et al, 2014; Amarasiri et al, 2021; Duffy & Martindale, 2019; Duffy et al, 2018; Farrell, Whitmore, et al, 2021; Patricio et al, 2012). Indeed, some of the rehabilitation water and sand eDNA samples utilized for sea turtle detection in the present study, were also simultaneously utilized to quantify a viral pathogen of sea turtles (Farrell, Whitmore, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the sea turtle species‐specific research possible with the methodologies established in this study, it is also possible to extend these genetic analysis tools further to include the investigation and monitoring of threats to these vulnerable animals (Amarasiri et al, 2021; Diaz‐Ferguson & Moyer, 2014; Farrell, Yetsko, et al, 2021; Huver et al, 2015; Miaud et al, 2019; Sengupta et al, 2019). Given that eDNA extraction recovered DNA from all organisms/pathogens present (shed DNA or microbes themselves) there is significant potential to simultaneously monitor wildlife and their pathogens from the same eDNA sample (Alfaro‐Nunez et al, 2014; Amarasiri et al, 2021; Duffy & Martindale, 2019; Duffy et al, 2018; Farrell, Whitmore, et al, 2021; Patricio et al, 2012). Indeed, some of the rehabilitation water and sand eDNA samples utilized for sea turtle detection in the present study, were also simultaneously utilized to quantify a viral pathogen of sea turtles (Farrell, Whitmore, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sand eDNA also benefits from being more straightforward than conventional invasive sampling approaches, enabling samples to be collected by networks of citizen-scientists/nesting patrol members, as utilized for this study. In addition to the sea turtle species-specific research possible with the methodologies established in this study, it is also possible to extend these genetic analysis tools further to include the investigation and monitoring of threats to these vulnerable animals (Amarasiri et al, 2021;Diaz-Ferguson & Moyer, 2014;Farrell, Yetsko, et al, 2021;Huver et al, 2015;Miaud et al, 2019;Sengupta et al, 2019) Duffy et al, 2018;Farrell, Whitmore, et al, 2021;Patricio et al, 2012). Indeed, some of the rehabilitation water and sand eDNA samples utilized for sea turtle detection in the present study, were also simultaneously utilized to quantify a viral pathogen of sea turtles (Farrell, Whitmore, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Edna Approaches To Sea Turtle Population Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the direct detection of leptospires in the urine and/or kidneys of animals is the easiest approach to identifying reservoirs, it is sometimes difficult from a practical point of view in wild environments such as that in Yaeyama. Recently, the potential of using an eDNA/eRNA-based approach has been proposed as a powerful method for monitoring disease vectors/hosts in aquatic environments and understanding the spread of infectious diseases to evaluate human health risks in a given area [ 62 ]. This study applied a previously developed eDNA metabarcoding method to analyse the Leptospira –animals correlation and identify potential reservoir animals [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas analysis of feces is usually not practical for aquatic parasites, the water itself provides a useful medium for detecting parasites simply through filtration. Hence, surveillance in aquatic systems has been deployed for detection of several human and wildlife pathogens, including parasites (Berger & Aubin-Horth 2018; Sieber et al 2020; Amarasiri et al 2021). Notably, such have been developed for detecting common water-born human parasites, such as Cryptosporidium spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%