2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00580-018-2876-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans VNI (ST 32) recovered from environmental and clinical isolates in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on their immediate interaction, cryptococcal cells could be environmental or clinical. Both showed similar pathogenicity in animal models [11] because of the similarity in the virulence factors -capsule, melanin, extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, and vesicular virulence bags (secretory vesicles containing microbodies, laccase, urease, and phosphatase) [12]. C. neoformans reprograms its gene expression profile to survive inadequate nutrient supply by upregulating the membrane transporters and enzymes involved in the shuttling of carbon intermediates from alternative pathways such as β-oxidation (mitochondria function) and glyoxylate cycle (peroxisome function) when phagocytosed by amoeba/macrophage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Based on their immediate interaction, cryptococcal cells could be environmental or clinical. Both showed similar pathogenicity in animal models [11] because of the similarity in the virulence factors -capsule, melanin, extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, and vesicular virulence bags (secretory vesicles containing microbodies, laccase, urease, and phosphatase) [12]. C. neoformans reprograms its gene expression profile to survive inadequate nutrient supply by upregulating the membrane transporters and enzymes involved in the shuttling of carbon intermediates from alternative pathways such as β-oxidation (mitochondria function) and glyoxylate cycle (peroxisome function) when phagocytosed by amoeba/macrophage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Based on their immediate interaction, cryptococcal cells could be environmental or clinical. Both showed similar pathogenicity in animal models [27] because of the similarity in the virulence factors capsule, melanin, extracellular secretory hydrolytic enzymes (like urease, phosphatase, DNase, lipase, protease, glycosidase), and membrane-associated enzymes (like laccase, IPC synthase, chitin synthase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase) [28]. Via the nutrient sensors like cAMP/Pka, Gpr1, Gpr4, Aap, Gpp2, and Hxt1, C. neoformans reprogram gene expressions to survive inadequate nutrient bioavailability and nutrient adaptation [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This pattern of infection re-emphasises why the immunocompromised individual is predisposed to cryptococcosis. By spore-inhalation, the C. neoformans pathogen becomes invasive (cryptococcemia) from the lungs to other parts of the body tissues and organs, particularly the CNS, brain, bones, skin, prostate, and heart [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early investigation showed that environmental isolates might be less virulent in the animal model compared to the clinical isolate [14]. However, a recent study has shown that the pathogenicity of the VNI strain, whether an environmental or a clinical isolate, was the same in the animal model [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%