2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenic Landscape of Transboundary Zoonotic Diseases in the Mexico–US Border Along the Rio Grande

Abstract: Transboundary zoonotic diseases, several of which are vector borne, can maintain a dynamic focus and have pathogens circulating in geographic regions encircling multiple geopolitical boundaries. Global change is intensifying transboundary problems, including the spatial variation of the risk and incidence of zoonotic diseases. The complexity of these challenges can be greater in areas where rivers delineate international boundaries and encompass transitions between ecozones. The Rio Grande serves as a natural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 258 publications
(323 reference statements)
0
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of five of these 11 EIA-reactive donors had positive immunoblots, which may be due to exposure to either B. microti or a similar organism or may represent cross-reactivity from unrelated sources. Enzootic B. microti has been reported in Colorado, 31 and pathogenic Babesia species have been described in Mexico; 32 thus, exposure in or near New Mexico may be a possibility, in addition to the possibility of exposure during travel to other states. Sera from patients with Lyme disease and anaplasmosis were found to yield low levels of reactivity in the B. microti EIA, an expected result based on the known occurrence of coin-fections by ticks carrying B. microti along with B. burgdorferi or A. phagocytophilum , 33,34 or alternatively of serial infections by these organisms leaving overlapping antibody titers in the human host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of five of these 11 EIA-reactive donors had positive immunoblots, which may be due to exposure to either B. microti or a similar organism or may represent cross-reactivity from unrelated sources. Enzootic B. microti has been reported in Colorado, 31 and pathogenic Babesia species have been described in Mexico; 32 thus, exposure in or near New Mexico may be a possibility, in addition to the possibility of exposure during travel to other states. Sera from patients with Lyme disease and anaplasmosis were found to yield low levels of reactivity in the B. microti EIA, an expected result based on the known occurrence of coin-fections by ticks carrying B. microti along with B. burgdorferi or A. phagocytophilum , 33,34 or alternatively of serial infections by these organisms leaving overlapping antibody titers in the human host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been estimated that 80 % of the world's cattle population is exposed to tick infestation (45) . Ticks are responsible for a variety of losses, caused by the direct effect of attachment, injection of toxins, or through the morbidity and mortality associated with tick-borne pathogens (46) , and secondary problems as the enhancement of transmission of Dermatophilosis, myiasis (47) , or udder damage by tick species belonging to the genus Amblyomma (48) . The estimated annual global costs associated with ticks and tick-transmitted pathogens range between US$ 13.9 billion and US$ 18.7 billion (49) .…”
Section: Potential Impact Of Cattle Ticksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to problems caused by A. donax with water flow and competition against indigenous riparian plant communities, the stated rationale for promoting the introduction of T. romana into the USA has also involved occasional incursions of cattle fever ticks [ Rhipicephalus annulatus (Say) and Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini)] from Mexico into the USA by providing a favorable habitat (Racelis et al., ; Esteve‐Gassent et al., ). Bags containing engorged adult female R. microplus were deployed under leaf litter in A. donax and forest habitats; 57 and 83.3% of the engorged ticks were alive after 11 days in A. donax and the forest habitat, respectively, and egg survivorship after 42 days was the same in both habitats (Racelis et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%