2021 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Safety for Robotics (ISR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/isr50024.2021.9419537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Planning and Moving Obstacle Avoidance with Neuromorphic Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it does not work with completely known and previously mapped environments where no learning is involved, as in ref. [14,24], or those that focus only on path‐planning and, therefore, assume that they can access the status of the entire map, such as in other studies. [ 7,21–23 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it does not work with completely known and previously mapped environments where no learning is involved, as in ref. [14,24], or those that focus only on path‐planning and, therefore, assume that they can access the status of the entire map, such as in other studies. [ 7,21–23 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it does not work with completely known and previously mapped environments where no learning is involved, as in ref. [14,24], or those that focus only on path-planning and, therefore, assume that they can access the status of the entire map, such as in other studies. [7,[21][22][23] The hippocampus model is responsible for cumulatively storing the result of the local mapping, resulting in a pseudomapping of the environment, while in refs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations