The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.3200/joer.98.1.5-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Analysis: An Introduction and Analysis of a Decade of Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
197
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
197
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings of correlation and regression analysis showed that there was no meaningful relationshipship between continuance commitment to school and sub-scales of school culture. It is known that path analysis shows the direct effect of relations between two variables (Stage et al, 2004;Kline, 2005;Huang, 2008). In this study, the results of path analysis, for the same data, indicated that there was no direct relationship between school culture and affective and normative commitment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Findings of correlation and regression analysis showed that there was no meaningful relationshipship between continuance commitment to school and sub-scales of school culture. It is known that path analysis shows the direct effect of relations between two variables (Stage et al, 2004;Kline, 2005;Huang, 2008). In this study, the results of path analysis, for the same data, indicated that there was no direct relationship between school culture and affective and normative commitment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…One strength of path analysis is that it allows for the testing of process (or chain) of influence (Streiner, 2005). That is, it enables us to test the direct and indirect (mediating) effect of multiple independent variables (e.g., financial management quality, perceived partner's financial behavior, and perceived financial mutuality) on the dependent variable (e.g., relationship satisfaction) (Stage, Carter, & Nora, 2004). SET suggests that, in a committed relationship, an individual's evaluation of his/her relationship satisfaction is a process that begins with the assessment of the interactions that occur between the individual and his/her partner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NNFI values are used to compare the posited model (i.e., researcher's model) to the null model (Garson, 2009 (Billings & Wroten, 1978;Garson, 2009). One limitation of standardized beta weights is that they do not allow for comparison across samples or studies (Gelfand, Mensinger, & Tenhave, 2009;Little, Card, Bovaird, Preacher & Crandall, 2007;Stage, Carter, Nora, 2004). Therefore, unstandardized beta weights were also reported to allow for the comparison across studies and samples.…”
Section: Primary Aim 1: To Compare Youth With and Without Adhd On Depmentioning
confidence: 99%