2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
78
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10,[12][13][14] Lots of studies reported that the ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft produced satisfactory clinical results. [15][16][17][18][19][20] However, a desire to avoid the sacrifice of autogenous tissue and to minimize surgical trauma and postoperative morbidity has promoted the consideration of allograft sources. 21 Because there are many obvious advantages of an allograft including smaller incision, a shorter operation time, a lack of donor-site morbidity, no size limitation and more appropriate for multiple ligamentous injury, and so on, several studies have shown that allograft is a reasonable alternative to autograft for ACL reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,[12][13][14] Lots of studies reported that the ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft produced satisfactory clinical results. [15][16][17][18][19][20] However, a desire to avoid the sacrifice of autogenous tissue and to minimize surgical trauma and postoperative morbidity has promoted the consideration of allograft sources. 21 Because there are many obvious advantages of an allograft including smaller incision, a shorter operation time, a lack of donor-site morbidity, no size limitation and more appropriate for multiple ligamentous injury, and so on, several studies have shown that allograft is a reasonable alternative to autograft for ACL reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found conflicting meta-analyses in two topics: choice of graft in ACL reconstruction (n = 7) (Table 1) [5,8,10,12,28,33,36], and hyaluronic acid for treating osteoarthritis of the knee (n = 5) ( Table 2) [1,7,18,19,35]. For these two topics, we could extract data on pain for hyaluronic acid, and the Lachman test, pivot shift, and extension lag for graft choice in ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ACL graft choice the studies by Biau et al [5], Forster and Forster [8], and Goldblatt et al [12] had the highest methodologic quality, but still presented conflicting conclusions (Tables 1 and 3). As mentioned above, the qualitative assessment of studies showed differences only in the surgical procedures, suggesting confounding by this variable [34].…”
Section: No Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yayımlanmış sistematik derleme sonuçlarından bazıları patellar tendon (PT) bazıları da hamstring tendonu lehinedir (11)(12). Birçoğu her iki greft tipinin de güçlü ve zayıf yönlerini vurgulamaktadır ancak bunların birbirlerine üstünlükleri konusunda bir sonuca varamamışlardır (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Bu konudaki araştırmaların devam etmesine karşın PT otogrefti halen bazı araştırmacılar tarafından altın standart olarak kabul edilmektedir (11,19).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified