2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
70
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Patellar resurfacing is a topic of continued debate in knee arthroplasty because empirical evidence shows equivocal outcomes compared with nonresurfacing. Advantages of patellar resurfacing include a lower reoperation rate because of less knee pain after surgery and better 2-year postoperative Knee Society clinical scores [41][42][43] ; however, disadvantages include fracture, hardware failure, and revision difficulty. 44 Spencer et al 12 retrospectively compared the outcomes of 169 TKA procedures in 110 patients with circumferential patellar denervation (83 TKA) versus patellar resurfacing (86 TKA).…”
Section: Patellar Resurfacing Versus Nonresurfacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patellar resurfacing is a topic of continued debate in knee arthroplasty because empirical evidence shows equivocal outcomes compared with nonresurfacing. Advantages of patellar resurfacing include a lower reoperation rate because of less knee pain after surgery and better 2-year postoperative Knee Society clinical scores [41][42][43] ; however, disadvantages include fracture, hardware failure, and revision difficulty. 44 Spencer et al 12 retrospectively compared the outcomes of 169 TKA procedures in 110 patients with circumferential patellar denervation (83 TKA) versus patellar resurfacing (86 TKA).…”
Section: Patellar Resurfacing Versus Nonresurfacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a recent study, it was found that anterior knee pain was less common in patients who underwent patellar surface change than those who did not. In the same study, the causes of PF joint revision were more common in patients without patella surface changes [166].…”
Section: Patellofemoral Joint Problemsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Moreover, the resurfacing group revealed a significantly higher postoperative knee society score pain and postoperative hospital for special surgery score. Accordingly, they concluded that patellar resurfacing group outperformed the non-resurfaced group, and thus resurfacing is the more effective option (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of patellar resurfacing point out the advantages such as cost-effectiveness, better functional outcomes, less anterior knee pain, and lower number of reoperations. Advocates of patellar retention believe that patellar resurfacing entails a higher risk of patellar fracture, dislocation, patellar tendon injury, and patellar component loosening (7). Moreover, the latter group believes that resurfacing offers no benefit in functional outcomes, reoperation rate, and total health-care cost (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%