01 mode than that of the same-size patch antenna without the notches. Therefore, the resonant frequencies of TM 10 and TM 01 are moved to lower and higher frequencies, respectively; that is, the frequency ratio of the proposed dual-frequency antenna can be controlled by d and w.
RESULTSAt the beginning, the square patch antenna without notches was constructed as a reference [3]. In this case, the coplanar microstrip feed line is directly connected to the edge of the patch, and the measured resonant frequencies of ports 1 and 2 are 2450 and 2550 MHz, respectively, where the resonant frequency is defined as the frequency with minimum return loss. The reason why the two resonant frequencies have such a small difference is that the two ports use different matching designs to obtain 50⍀ input impedance. Then, several prototypes of the proposed dual-frequency antennas with different notch sizes were constructed and measured. Figure 2 shows the measured return loss at each port and isolations between the two ports for the cases of d ϭ 2, 8, and 10 mm when w is fixed to be 3 mm. From the results, it can be observed that the resonant frequencies of ports 1 and 2 have a 455-MHz decrease (Ϫ19%) and a 90-MHz increase (ϩ3.5%), respectively, when the inset length is increased from 2 to 10 mm. It means the larger the inset length, the higher the frequency ratio of the two resonant frequencies. Comparing to the results of the same-size square patch antenna without the notches, the frequency ratio is increased from 1.04 to 1.36 when the inset length of the coplanar microstrip line is 10 mm. In addition, the higher frequency ratio of the dual-frequency antenna would reduce the coupling strength of the two resonant modes, which results in a higher isolation between the two ports. With regard to the effects of the notch width w on the resonant frequencies, Figure 3 presents the measured return loss and isolation for the three cases of w ϭ 3, 5, and 7 mm when d is fixed to be 2 mm. It can be found that ports 1 and 2 have a 40-MHz decrease (Ϫ1.7%) and a 25-MHz increase (ϩ1%), respectively, which are relatively smaller than those of the case the inset length was changed. These measured results are also summarized in Table 1.For the prototype with notch dimensions of d ϭ 8 mm and w ϭ 3 mm, Figure 4 plots the measured E-plane and H-plane radiation patterns at 2090 MHz for port 1 and 2630 MHz for port 2. Good broadside radiation patterns are obtained, and the peak gains are 2.6 and 3.1 dBi for ports 1 and 2, respectively. Cross-polarization levels of less than Ϫ25 dB in the broadside direction are also observed.
CONCLUSIONThe design of a dual-frequency microstrip antenna for operation at different frequency ratios has been presented. By adjusting the inset length of coplanar microstrip feed line, the frequency ratio can be varied from 1.04 to 1.36, and an isolation level of less than Ϫ27 dB is also obtained. The antenna's structure makes it suitable as an array element.