2017
DOI: 10.1080/10588167.2017.1404301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pasts and Futures of Digital Humanities in Musicology: Moving Towards a “Bigger Tent”

Abstract: Musicologists and music theorists have traditionally been early adopters of technological tools to assist with research. The earliest digital humanities projects in musicology and music theory came directly out of humanities computing and quantitative analytical technologies developed in the 1980s, but newer projects created since the mid-2000s still reflect this past of algorithmic analysis and archival compilation, retrieval, and display. Computational and archival research is, currently, only one branch of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple computational and visualization‐based approaches have been proposed to facilitate music analysis tasks [Tym12, Wat02]. Integrating the analyst into the analysis process to support knowledge generation and verification [SSS*14] is necessary since exclusively computational approaches [Urb17] cannot model human intuition about semantic meaning. In the visualization domain, graph‐based [HMM00], matrix‐based [KS10] and projection‐based [LS19] techniques have been proposed to facilitate the visual analysis at different levels of abstraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple computational and visualization‐based approaches have been proposed to facilitate music analysis tasks [Tym12, Wat02]. Integrating the analyst into the analysis process to support knowledge generation and verification [SSS*14] is necessary since exclusively computational approaches [Urb17] cannot model human intuition about semantic meaning. In the visualization domain, graph‐based [HMM00], matrix‐based [KS10] and projection‐based [LS19] techniques have been proposed to facilitate the visual analysis at different levels of abstraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encloses all information related to music, for example, sound patterns, scores, biographical information about artists, music genres and their dependencies. Similar to other subdomains of the humanities, in recent years, digital methods became increasingly important in musicology to store, structure and analyse vast amounts of digitally available musicological data [Urb17]. To achieve these tasks, visualization is a key element in this context, as it enables easier access to the data and has the capability to highlight relationships between structural elements of music [Lam12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jewish music studies is still a surprisingly recent disciplinary participant in digital humanities scholarship. Even as musicologist and metadata librarian Michelle Urberg observes that ethnomusicologists have regularly made use of a plethora of digital humanities tools since the 1980s (2018:134), Jewish historian Itay Marienberg-Milikowsky recognizes that Jewish studies have been slow to catch on to this trend (2020:19). Today, beyond a handful of institutional Jewish sound archives, book companion websites, and largely self-published podcasts, few scholars working at the intersections of these disciplines have recognized the potential of making research findings accessible to and engaging for the public.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%