2014
DOI: 10.3213/2191-5784-10246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past Environmental Proxies from the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show a remarkable disconnect between environmental and cultural change. Various indicators of climate and vegetation, suggesting drier and warmer conditions with more open grassland habitats than today, remain constant throughout the period of study (see [ 17 , 126 , 157 – 159 ]) with minor random fluctuations (see [ 160 ]), while the lithic technology undergoes marked and unidirectional changes. Behavioral change thus occurred independent of environmental change, suggesting that the observed alterations in technology do not constitute adaptive responses to variable natural environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show a remarkable disconnect between environmental and cultural change. Various indicators of climate and vegetation, suggesting drier and warmer conditions with more open grassland habitats than today, remain constant throughout the period of study (see [ 17 , 126 , 157 – 159 ]) with minor random fluctuations (see [ 160 ]), while the lithic technology undergoes marked and unidirectional changes. Behavioral change thus occurred independent of environmental change, suggesting that the observed alterations in technology do not constitute adaptive responses to variable natural environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant amount of research has focused on the artifacts and ecofacts recovered from the HP deposits at Sibudu (e.g., botanical remains: Allott, 2005Allott, , 2006Sievers, 2006;Hall et al, 2008Hall et al, , 2014Bruch et al, 2012;faunal remains: Glenny, 2006;Plug, 2006;Clark and Plug, 2008;Plug and Clark, 2008;Clark, 2009Clark, , 2011Clark, , 2013Clark and Ligouis, 2010;Wadley, 2010;Val, 2016;Val et al, 2016;lithic/organic technology: Backwell et al, 2008;Lombard, 2008Lombard, , 2011Wadley and Mohapi, 2008;Lombard and Phillipson, 2010;d'Errico et al, 2012;de la Peña et al, 2013;de la Peña andWadley, 2014a, 2014b;de la Peña, 2015;Soriano et al, 2015;geoarchaeology/dating: Jacobs et al, 2008ageoarchaeology/dating: Jacobs et al, , 2008bGoldberg et al, 2009;other: Wadley, 2008other: Wadley, , 2012Hodgkiss, 2013); here I will summarize the results of those aspects of the data most relevant to our understanding of the faunal assemblage: 1) paleoenvironmental reconstruction and 2) hunting technologies/techniques.…”
Section: The Howieson's Poort At Sibudu Cavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three classes of data deriving from the botanical record provide information on paleoclimate during the HP: charcoal, seeds, and the isotopic analysis of charcoal (Allott, 2005(Allott, , 2006Sievers, 2006;Hall et al, 2008Hall et al, , 2014. Published data are thus far limited to material recovered from units B5 and B6; furthermore, analyses by Allott (2006) and Hall et al (2008Hall et al ( , 2014) incorporated only layers GS and GR. In all cases, the HP was considered as a single unit, although Hall et al (2008) include a data table that presents results for both GS and GR.…”
Section: Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction: Botanical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has a sequence of archaeological layers from the Middle Stone Age, dated by single-grain optically stimulated luminescence to approximately 77-38 ka. [2][3][4][5][6] Some of the evidence for the behaviour of the anatomically modern people who visited and lived at Sibudu includes stone tools, ochre, bone, perforated seashells and hearths [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] , as well as evidence for the making and use of compound adhesives 16 , and circumstantial evidence for snares 17 and bows and arrows 18 . There is evidence of the use of plant resources from pollen, phytoliths, seeds, nutlets, stems, charcoal and leaves excavated at Sibudu.…”
Section: Sibudumentioning
confidence: 99%