Passive Reactive Berm to Provide Low Maintenance Lead Containment at Active Small Arms Firing Ranges: Field Demonstration

Abstract

Heavy metals are released into the environment as a result of critical military live-fire training. Preventing heavy-metal migration into and contamination of the local environment is crucial because remediating contaminated soils is resource intensive, difficult, and costly. Previous studies have demonstrated that phosphate amendments have been successfully used as a best management practice (BMP) to immobilize metal contaminants. The Passive Reactive Berm (PRBerm™) technology incorporates phosphate amendments with ballistic sand to immobilize soluble metals (e.g., lead) during the inevitable bullet corrosion process. Treatability studies determined that an amendment ratio of 5% (weight/ weight) to sand was sufficient to contain > 90% of soluble lead within the berm material. The technology was field tested on the M-60 small arms firing range (SAFR) at Charleston Air Force Base (CAFB) in Charleston, South Carolina. The CAFB PRBerm™ was tested with a 5% TRAPPS™ amendment (a granular, apatite-based material), alone and in combination with a 5% thermally treated fish bone Apatite™.For the CAFB PRBerm™, storm water runoff and leachate water samples were collected directly from the SAFR and analyzed for metals, total suspended solids (TSS), and pH. Reduced metals migration in soil leachate and surface water runoff when compared to the traditional earthen berm was observed. The total suspended solids in the leachate and runoff waters from the amended berms increased over the control berm. Results indicated that the pH of the runoff waters from the amended berms remained acidic.

Fort Knox, KY Containment Berm Unit Installation

“…The cost is reported as the fabrication and installation of one Containment Berm Unit. While this provides a good estimate of what it may cost to install multiple Containment Berm Units, the user should be aware that cost offsets could also be incorporated due to various factors such as: The initial assumptions are listed below and are based on previous work as well as results from the PRBerm™ study (Larson et al 2004;Larson et al 2005;Larson et al 2007, Wynter et al 2012. The use of a containment berm may be indicated when the native soils of the bullet impact area:…”

“…Preface .................................................................................................................................................... Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1.1 Visit .................................................................................................................... 2.1.2 Coordination Site Visit ....................................................................................................... Preparation ..................................................................................................... 2.2.2 Containment Berm Unit Costs ........................................................................................ 2.2.3 Containment Berm Unit Installation............................................................................... (Larson et al 2007, Wynter et al 2012).…”