2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parvalbumin interneuron inhibition onto anterior insula neurons projecting to the basolateral amygdala drives aversive taste memory retrieval

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(134 reference statements)
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Guided by evidence regarding the induction of plasticity cascades, the expression of immediate early genes, as well as the timeframes involved in LTP and LTD at the IC (Rosenblum et al, 1997;Hanamori et al, 1998;Jones et al, 1999;Escobar and Bermúdez-Rattoni, 2000), the five treatment groups were sacrificed 1 hour following taste consumption. Even though changes in activity can be observed within seconds to minutes, depending on their novelty, salience and valence (Barot et al, 2008;Lavi et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2020), sensory experiences can modulate the function of IC neurons for hours (Juárez-Muñoz et al, 2017;Rodríguez-Durán et al, 2017;Haley et al, 2020;Yiannakas et al, 2021).We had previously identified a CaMKII-dependent short-term memory trace at the IC that last for the first 3 hours following taste experiences, regardless of their valence (Adaikkan and Rosenblum, 2015). To address whether similar time-dependency of the physiological correlations engaged by the IC during novel taste learning, a 6 th group was sacrificed 4 hours following novel saccharin exposure (Figure 1 -Saccharin 1x (4hrs)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Guided by evidence regarding the induction of plasticity cascades, the expression of immediate early genes, as well as the timeframes involved in LTP and LTD at the IC (Rosenblum et al, 1997;Hanamori et al, 1998;Jones et al, 1999;Escobar and Bermúdez-Rattoni, 2000), the five treatment groups were sacrificed 1 hour following taste consumption. Even though changes in activity can be observed within seconds to minutes, depending on their novelty, salience and valence (Barot et al, 2008;Lavi et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2020), sensory experiences can modulate the function of IC neurons for hours (Juárez-Muñoz et al, 2017;Rodríguez-Durán et al, 2017;Haley et al, 2020;Yiannakas et al, 2021).We had previously identified a CaMKII-dependent short-term memory trace at the IC that last for the first 3 hours following taste experiences, regardless of their valence (Adaikkan and Rosenblum, 2015). To address whether similar time-dependency of the physiological correlations engaged by the IC during novel taste learning, a 6 th group was sacrificed 4 hours following novel saccharin exposure (Figure 1 -Saccharin 1x (4hrs)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the IC, the maturation of GABAergic PV circuits is key for multisensory integration and pruning of cross-modal input to coordinate the detection of relevant information (Gogolla et al, 2014). Activation of IC PV disrupts the expression of taste-guided goal-directed behavior (Vincis et al, 2020), and enhances taste-guided aversive responses (Yiannakas et al, 2021). Our findings could be indicative of a prediction-dependent decoupling mechanism at the IC, whereby the restriction of bursting activity in LIV-VI aIC-BLA neurons impinges on innate drives towards the tastant and further learning, depending on prior experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CFM consolidation relies on activity of D1/5 dopamine receptors, and downstream activation of cAMP and ERK, in hippocampal PV+ interneurons in the hours following CFC (Karunakaran et al, 2016). PV+ interneurons in various brain structures, including the insular cortex, medial septum, and nucleus accumbens also play critical roles during memory recallcoordinating activity within limbic structures during recall of appetitive and aversive associations (Trouche et al, 2019;Sans-Dublanc et al, 2020;Yiannakas et al, 2021). Altogether, these data highlight the importance of PV+ interneurons for memory processing, and underscore that the connectivity between PV+ interneurons and the principal cells they target is crucial for engram formation.…”
Section: Pv+ and Sst+ Interneurons Are Critical Regulators Of Memory Encoding Storage And Recallmentioning
confidence: 99%