1974
DOI: 10.2307/421415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party System, Social Structure, and Competitive Politics in West Germany: An Ecological Analysis of the 1972 Federal Election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis of debate effects will be based on a panel survey, 1 which puts us in the fortunate position of being able to examine attitude change across time. In order to provide the context in which the German debates took place, let us briefly review the setting of the 1972 election (Conradt and Lambert, 1974;Heidenheimer and Kommers, 1975: ch. 5;Kaltefleiter, 1973;and Kaase, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis of debate effects will be based on a panel survey, 1 which puts us in the fortunate position of being able to examine attitude change across time. In order to provide the context in which the German debates took place, let us briefly review the setting of the 1972 election (Conradt and Lambert, 1974;Heidenheimer and Kommers, 1975: ch. 5;Kaltefleiter, 1973;and Kaase, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical nationalists were accommodated by the formerly principal party of the state-party nexus, the CDU, which opposed Ostpolitik as a project betraying the cause of reunification and opening West Germany to communist infiltration (Tilford, 1975: 14;Clemens, 1989: 60). The result of this opposition along conservative-nationalist lines by a party that had until then been identified with the state's Western orientation was that in the 1972 elections fought over Ostpolitik the CDU absorbed the nationalist protest vote of the NPD (Conradt and Lambert, 1974). These elections were won by the SPD-FDP coalition, confirming the three parties' collective ability to absorb both the left-radical and right-nationalist threats to the legitimacy of the West German state.…”
Section: Triumphant Progressives Accommodated Nationalists: Brandt'smentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Trudeau personalized the leadership around his own popularity and excluded party cadres, governing the country with assistance from technocrats (Bittner, 2018; Meisel, 1979). Appropriate parallels come from Tony Blair’s leadership of British Labour (Calise, 2000), the personalization of the US Democratic Party during the Roosevelt presidency (Milkis, 1985), the French Parti Socialiste in the 14-year-long Mitterrand presidency (Gaffney, 1989), how in 1960s Germany the Social Democrats’ electoral campaigns completely focused on Willy Brandt (Conradt and Lambert, 1974), and finally Indira Gandhi’s capture of the Congress party in India (Hardgrave, 1984).…”
Section: Historical Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%