2011
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.555984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Preferences and Electoral Reform: How Time in Government Affects the Likelihood of Supporting Electoral Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although few in number, there have been some large-N studies of electoral reform using quantitative methods. Here, Norris (2011) uses data from the World Value Study to test a theory that relates political culture to institutional reform, while Pilet and Bol (2011), Celis et al (2011) and Renwick (2011 have created their own databases that include: party preferences about electoral system change; gender quota laws adopted in more than 50 countries; and no fewer than 84 cases of electoral system change in Europe since 1945. These studies go a long way toward identifying the determinants of electoral reform because they uncover universal patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although few in number, there have been some large-N studies of electoral reform using quantitative methods. Here, Norris (2011) uses data from the World Value Study to test a theory that relates political culture to institutional reform, while Pilet and Bol (2011), Celis et al (2011) and Renwick (2011 have created their own databases that include: party preferences about electoral system change; gender quota laws adopted in more than 50 countries; and no fewer than 84 cases of electoral system change in Europe since 1945. These studies go a long way toward identifying the determinants of electoral reform because they uncover universal patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If electoral reform can indeed be an 'accident', then rational choice plays little or no part in its adoption. Moreover, it seems that parties do not trust prospective simulations very much, and that it is the parties most dissatisfied with the rules in use (parties that have been most often in the opposition) that are more likely to support a change in the electoral system (Pilet and Bol 2011;Sakamoto 1999).…”
Section: Why Does Electoral Reform Occur?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current literature focuses on increasing the number of women in political participation and representation by analysing the structure of political systems in terms of the role of parties and electoral reform. In fact, it has been suggested that political parties, in selecting and promoting candidates, are motivated less by strategic advantage than by social values, norms, and ideologies (Celis, Krook & Meier 2011;Pilet & Bol 2011). This highlights the importance of the social and cultural context as noted by Karp and Banducci (2008) among others.…”
Section: Justification Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ce résultat confirme des conclusions similaires portant sur le soutien des élites politiques en faveur de l'adoption de mécanismes de démocratie directe 43 . Dans une perspective similaire, Bol et Pilet ont analysé la position des partis dans 13 processus de réformes électoraux en mettant en évidence le fait que les partis qui avaient été au gouvernement plus de 60% du temps pendant les 25 dernières années avaient une chance significativement plus forte de soutenir le système électoral existant, quelles que soient les conséquences attendues en termes de sièges 44 .…”
Section: Alternance Politique Et Réforme Des Règles Démocratiquesunclassified