2016
DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsv066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Gate-Keeping and Women's Appointment to Parliamentary Committees: Evidence from the Italian Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these studies consistently identify gendered divisions of labour, they use different methods for constructing measures of committee status necessary to identify vertical division of labour, and schemas for classifying committees according to their "masculine" or "feminine" characteristics necessary to identify the horizontal division of labour. As Pansardi and Vercesi (2017) argue, the distinction between committee gender and status is often not made clear, with the implicit assumption being that "masculine" committees -however defined -are the most prestigious, a claim that elides horizontal with vertical aspects of gendered division of labour.…”
Section: The Gendered Division Of Labour On Parliamentary Committeesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these studies consistently identify gendered divisions of labour, they use different methods for constructing measures of committee status necessary to identify vertical division of labour, and schemas for classifying committees according to their "masculine" or "feminine" characteristics necessary to identify the horizontal division of labour. As Pansardi and Vercesi (2017) argue, the distinction between committee gender and status is often not made clear, with the implicit assumption being that "masculine" committees -however defined -are the most prestigious, a claim that elides horizontal with vertical aspects of gendered division of labour.…”
Section: The Gendered Division Of Labour On Parliamentary Committeesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prestige is often used to rank committees, and most research on the role of MPs' sex in appointments finds an uneven distribution of women and men across committees. Women are often overrepresented in social issue committees and those dealing with equality, and underrepresented in powerful committees and those representing issues that are traditionally 'men's' domains (Thomas, 1994;Friedman, 1996;Towns, 2003;Diaz, 2005;Heath et al, 2005;Schwindt-Bayer, 2010;Kerevel and Atkeson, 2013;Bolzendahl, 2014;Pansardi and Vercesi, 2017). Given that this pattern is even found in Denmark, one of the most advanced countries in terms of gender equality in politics, we expect to find similar disparities in most other settings (as argued by Baekgaard and Kjaer, 2012, p. 480).…”
Section: The Role Of Mps' Sex In Committee Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24-25). Committee members are important for shaping party policy (Friedman, 1996;Pansardi and Vercesi, 2017) and therefore party leaders value committee members with expertise in relevant policy areas (Ciftci et al, 2008;Mickler 2018aMickler , 2018b. It is pertinent to note the differences between women and men in expertise: female MPs are more likely to have careers in education, while men are more likely to come from business backgrounds (Thomas, 1994).…”
Section: The Role Of Mps' Sex In Committee Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, attention is especially paid to barriers to enter given political posts. Usually, scholars study women's political representation; however, the basic arguments can be easily extended to other societal segments (e.g., Norris and Lovenduski, 1995;Carnes 2016;Gouglas et al, 2018;Pansardi and Vercesi, 2017). Krook (2010: 708) summarizes the approach's assumptions by describing political careers as a step-by-step process.…”
Section: Structure and Political Careers: Context-oriented Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%