1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01957771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parton distributions in the photon

Abstract: We discuss in detail the photon structure function beyond the leading logarithm approximation. Of special concern is the factorization scheme and the hadronic input ; we show h o w to naturally absorb large terms due to the MS factorization scheme in a modied hadronic component. The eect of the charm quark mass threshold is also discussed in relation to the phenomenology. A comparison with data shows that the modied hadronic component can be reasonably described by a VDM-type input.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
183
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
183
2
Order By: Relevance
“…in agreement with DIS γ γ experiments [17]. For a virtual photon, Q 2 0 must be replaced by max(Q 2 , Q 2 0 ) and the convolution with the spectrum of the photon emitted by the electron takes the form…”
Section: Comparison With Opal Datasupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in agreement with DIS γ γ experiments [17]. For a virtual photon, Q 2 0 must be replaced by max(Q 2 , Q 2 0 ) and the convolution with the spectrum of the photon emitted by the electron takes the form…”
Section: Comparison With Opal Datasupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We also use the AFG parton distributions [17] and the value Λ For the scales µ = M = p Tγ used here the single resolved contribution is larger than the double resolved contribution by a factor 3 to 6 which increases when p Tγ increases. The single resolved contribution constitutes about 70 % of the total cross Figure 2: The NLO single resolved, double resolved and direct cross sections dσ γ+X /dp Tγ .…”
Section: Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of flavours was set to 5 and the renormalisation and factorisation scales, µ, were set to half the sum of the transverse energies of the final-state partons, E T /2. Two different parameterisations of the photon parton density were used 3 : GRV-HO [34] and AFG-HO [51]. The parton densities in the proton were parameterised using CTEQ5M1 [35]; the value α s (M Z ) = 0.118 used therein was adopted for the central prediction.…”
Section: Nlo Qcd Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude let us recall that an improvement of f π (x, Q 2 ) is particularly important in view of its central role in the construction of the photon structure function and the photonic parton distributions [14,15,16,17,18]. Furthermore, recent (large rapidity gap) measurements of leading proton and neutron production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA [19] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%