2002
DOI: 10.1007/s100520200936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dijet photoproduction at HERA and the structure of the photon

Abstract: The dijet cross section in photoproduction has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA using an integrated luminosity of 38.6 pb −1 . The events were required to have a virtuality of the incoming photon, Q 2 , of less than 1 GeV 2 and a photon-proton centre-of-mass energy in the range 134 < W γp < 277 GeV. Each event contains at least two jets satisfying transverse-energy requirements of E jet1 T > 14 GeV and E jet2 T > 11 GeV and pseudorapidity requirements of −1 < η jet1,2 < 2.4. The measurements are co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here E i T and η i refer to the transverse energies and pseudorapidities of the jets, y is the inelasticity of the ep scattering and E e the energy of the electron beam. Figure 3 show comparisons between the ZEUS measurement [3] for the dijet photoproduction in ep collisions at HERA and the PYTHIA 8 simulation with direct-enhanced (x obs γ > 0.75) and resolvedenhanced (x obs γ < 0.75) event samples. The (sub-)leading jet were required to have E T > 14(11) GeV and the invariant mass of the photon-proton system were constrained to 134 < W γp < 277 GeV range.…”
Section: Dijet Photoproduction At Heramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here E i T and η i refer to the transverse energies and pseudorapidities of the jets, y is the inelasticity of the ep scattering and E e the energy of the electron beam. Figure 3 show comparisons between the ZEUS measurement [3] for the dijet photoproduction in ep collisions at HERA and the PYTHIA 8 simulation with direct-enhanced (x obs γ > 0.75) and resolvedenhanced (x obs γ < 0.75) event samples. The (sub-)leading jet were required to have E T > 14(11) GeV and the invariant mass of the photon-proton system were constrained to 134 < W γp < 277 GeV range.…”
Section: Dijet Photoproduction At Heramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3: Dijet photoproduction as a function of η jet2 for events with x obs γ < 0.75 (left) and x obs γ > 0.75 (right) with three different photon PDF set, CJKL (red) [4], GRV (green) [5] and SaSgam (orange) [6]. Data from ZEUS [3].…”
Section: Dijet Photoproduction At Heramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy and the position of the jet are next corrected for instrumental effects such as dead material and noncompensation. This jet energy scale (JES) correction is calculated using isolated jets 4 in the Monte Carlo simulation as a function of energy and pseudorapidity of the reconstructed jet. The JES correction factor ranges from about 2.1 for low-energy jets with p T ¼ 20 GeV in the central region jyj < 0:3 to less than 1.2 for high-energy jets in the most forward region 3:6 jyj < 4:4.…”
Section: Jet Reconstruction and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are an important tool for understanding the strong interaction and searching for physics beyond the standard model (see, for example, Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that the jet transverse momenta p T are sufficiently large, this process allows one to probe the microscopic quark-gluon structure of the proton and the real photon in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) as well as the strong interaction dynamics in the regime of perturbative QCD (pQCD). The predictions of next-to-leading order (NLO) pQCD provide a good description of the dijet photoproduction cross section measured at HERA as a function of various jet observables in a wide range of p T [4,5,6,7]. This serves as an important test of the QCD factorization and universality of parton distribution functions (PDFs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%