2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2010)26:1(19)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnering Process Model for Public-Sector Fast-Track Design-Build Projects in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
18
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The above evidence strengthens the argument that the move to use alternative procurement systems is not a guarantee that the deficiencies of the traditional system will be overcome (Cho et al, 2010). Interestingly, dispute was proven to be a major problem in both systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The above evidence strengthens the argument that the move to use alternative procurement systems is not a guarantee that the deficiencies of the traditional system will be overcome (Cho et al, 2010). Interestingly, dispute was proven to be a major problem in both systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Disputes under D&C received the highest agreement (mean = 3.96) because f the uncertainty of drawing, which yields numerous problems in project management, as proposed by Cho et al (2010). However, in traditional systems, Tien and Jason (2006) found that variations also cause disputes among various parties, thus resulting in cost uncertainty with changes in design and scope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations