Abstract:There is growing evidence from practitioners that the advertising industry is in a state of crisis. As campaigns become more integrated and multidisciplinary , the relationship between advertising agencies and clients is being tested to its limits and is presently considered to be at an all-time low. Agencies feel less valued and are being excluded from C-suite discussion. Clients feel that agencies do not appreciate the changing landscape and how the customer experience is now key. Both sides recognise the ne… Show more
“…Se es consciente, además, que considerar a las agencias de relaciones públicas y comunicación como proveedores, más que como socios que participan en las decisiones estratégicas de gestión, no está ausente de la controversia a nivel teórico. Sin embargo, muchas organizaciones consideran como parte de sus proveedores a las agencias de relaciones públicas y comunicación con las que colaboran (Doan y Bilowol, 2014;Mortimer y Laurie, 2017).…”
El propósito de este artículo es el desarrollo de un modelo ex novo para seleccionar a una agencia de relaciones públicas y comunicación, o que preste servicios de relaciones públicas, basado en las percepciones de los responsables de comunicación de las organizaciones de mayor facturación españolas asociadas a la Asociación de Directivos de Comunicación-Dircom, e inspirado en el modelo matricial de una rúbrica de valoración por competencias de Goodrich (2005). Para este cometido se cursó un cuestionario y se hizo un análisis factorial y un análisis de contenido a la información obtenida para conocer, validar y clasificar los atributos que se utilizan cuando se selecciona una agencia de relaciones públicas y comunicación. Los resultados indican que los departamentos de comunicación consideran como atributos principales: la experiencia, la especialización en el sector y cartera de clientes; la profesionalidad, fiabilidad y calidad del servicio que se presenta; y la propuesta económica. Con este modelo lo que se persigue es enriquecer los capítulos que ofrece la literatura acerca de los departamentos y agencias de relaciones públicas y comunicación y, profesionalmente, ayudar a estos departamentos de comunicación a seleccionar objetivamente a una agencia de relaciones públicas y comunicación, en el marco de los modelos de decisión final.
“…Se es consciente, además, que considerar a las agencias de relaciones públicas y comunicación como proveedores, más que como socios que participan en las decisiones estratégicas de gestión, no está ausente de la controversia a nivel teórico. Sin embargo, muchas organizaciones consideran como parte de sus proveedores a las agencias de relaciones públicas y comunicación con las que colaboran (Doan y Bilowol, 2014;Mortimer y Laurie, 2017).…”
El propósito de este artículo es el desarrollo de un modelo ex novo para seleccionar a una agencia de relaciones públicas y comunicación, o que preste servicios de relaciones públicas, basado en las percepciones de los responsables de comunicación de las organizaciones de mayor facturación españolas asociadas a la Asociación de Directivos de Comunicación-Dircom, e inspirado en el modelo matricial de una rúbrica de valoración por competencias de Goodrich (2005). Para este cometido se cursó un cuestionario y se hizo un análisis factorial y un análisis de contenido a la información obtenida para conocer, validar y clasificar los atributos que se utilizan cuando se selecciona una agencia de relaciones públicas y comunicación. Los resultados indican que los departamentos de comunicación consideran como atributos principales: la experiencia, la especialización en el sector y cartera de clientes; la profesionalidad, fiabilidad y calidad del servicio que se presenta; y la propuesta económica. Con este modelo lo que se persigue es enriquecer los capítulos que ofrece la literatura acerca de los departamentos y agencias de relaciones públicas y comunicación y, profesionalmente, ayudar a estos departamentos de comunicación a seleccionar objetivamente a una agencia de relaciones públicas y comunicación, en el marco de los modelos de decisión final.
“…Hamilton et al (2019, p. 532) cite the Court et al (2009) definition of a consumer journey as “an iterative process through which the consumer begins to consider alternatives to satisfy a want or a need, evaluates and chooses among them, and then engages in consumption”, which lacks any reference to touch points. Similarly, Schamp et al (2019) and Mortimer and Laurie (2019) also highlighted the traditional consumer decision-making models/stages when referring to the consumer decision-making journey. Herhausen et al (2019, p. 11) suggested customer journey research began in the 1960s relating to the buying process.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schamp et al , 2019 who refer to consideration phase and choice stage). However, there were many papers that did reference the stages as part of the customer journey (For example see Batra and Keller, 2016; Schamp et al , 2019; Mortimer and Laurie, 2019; Herhausen et al , 2019; Steward et al , 2019; Rudkowski et al , 2020; Shavitt and Barnes, 2019; Lemon and Verhoef, 2016). Overall, this analysis highlights that there was an inconsistent approach beyond whether the decision-making process stages were considered as part of the customer journey, but if they were considered, what stages were used.…”
PurposeThis paper aims to define and frame the understanding of customer journeys, associated areas of consumer decision-making process stages and touch point categories based on an ownership perspective.Design/methodology/approachThe research is based on a detailed literature review of customer journeys, in peer-reviewed marketing and retail journals, within the last decade. The Chartered Association of Business Schools (ABS) academic journal guide marketing discipline list was used because it only includes peer-reviewed journals, based on an internationally accepted quality ranked list.FindingsThe detailed analysis of the journals identified three groups of touch points (brand owned, partner owned/managed and outside the control of brand owner/partner) and three decision-making process stages (pre-purchase, purchase and post–purchase) that informed a clearer definition and understanding of the customer journey.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations concern the ABS database was used and a ten-year date period was selected, which may exclude some relevant journal articles, particularly those written in a language other than English.Originality/valueThe authors have provided a revised definition of customer journey, clarified the decision-making stages and subsequent categorisation of touch points from an ownership perspective.
“…They proposed that a greater degree of integration would be achieved if there was a high level of collaboration and sharing of information as well as clients having fewer agencies and minimising agency turnover. However, more recent research by Mortimer and Laurie (2019) suggests that the opposite is happening, with agencies being increasingly used as suppliers instead of partners, and a clear shift of power and influence moving towards clients.…”
Section: Imc and The Client/agency Relationshipmentioning
Reports from the advertising industry suggest that the pressure to create effective integrated campaigns across the ever-increasing mix of paid, owned and earned media is putting an enormous strain on client/agency relationships. This research identifies the main challenges that an Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) approach places on this relationship and thereby advances the IMC literature by examining the practical challenges of implementation. Six key issues, developed from academic and industry sources, are presented to advertising experts, through a Delphi study, to stimulate debate and identify areas of agreement. The findings are brought together in a model which presents three main areas that need to be addressed, along with specific recommendations. These topics include the need for clients to provide stronger leadership in defining agency roles and responsibilities, more transparent remuneration systems to encourage teamwork across agencies as well as individual input and an increased emphasis on the strategic contribution from agencies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.