Partitioning of Pollinators during Flowering in an African Acacia Community

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology.Abstract. Competition for pollination is an important factor structuring flowering in many plant communities. We examined mechanisms reducing interspecific pollen flow in a community of 10 Acacia species in a highly seasonal savannah habitat in Tanzania. Partitioning is achieved, in part, through separation of flowering in space and seasonal time, and through interspecific differences in pollinator guilds. Nevertheless, coflowering Acacia species shared several pollinators; this means that interspecific pollen transfer is possible. We analyzed daily patterns of pollinator activity and pollen release in 10 Acacia assemblages containing a total of 10 Acacia species. Pollinator activity was scored using counts at flowers over constant time intervals throughout the day. Pollen availability was assessed using a simple method which allows quantification of pollen exposed on the surface of the Acacia inflorescence. Sympatric co-flowering Acacia species each show high intraspecific synchrony but release their pollen at different times of day. Pollinators rapidly harvest available pollen and move from one Acacia species to the next, following the daily sequence of pollen release. The activity of shared pollinators is structured throughout the day as a result of temporal patterns of pollen release across Acacia species. The observed temporal structuring of pollen release is compatible with patterns predicted to result from competitive displacement. Additional support for a competition-based explanation for this patterning comes from the observation that an Acacia species flowering without competitors shows no synchronized peak of pollen availability at any time of day. competition for pollinator visits in natural systems (Waser 1983, Rathcke 1983, 1988) and minimization of the costs associated with either mechanism of competition is thought to be an important force structuring plant communities (Pleasants 1983, Rathcke 1983, 1988, Waser 1983, Armbruster and Herzig 1984, Rathcke and Lacey 1985, Feinsinger 1987). An expected evolutionary consequence of competition is divergence along some resource axis (resource partitioning) to reduce the negative interaction between coexisting species (Brown and Wilson 1956, Pianka 1973, Schoener 1983). Four resource axes have received attention. First, plants may differ in the pollinators they recruit (axis 1), and so have independent vectors of pollen transfer (Heinrich 1976, Inouye 1978, Pleasants 1983, Armbruster and Herzig 1984, Rathcke 1988). However, pollinator guilds of plant species often overlap and many studies have examined mechanisms th...

Floral visitors and reproductive strategies in five melittophilous species of Bignoniaceae in Southeastern Brazil

“…There are phenological and habitat differences between some of the species as well, but even when species flower at the same time in the same habitat, they attract different suites of bees. This can be an evolutionary consequence of competition to reduce the negative interaction between coexisting species (Stone et al 1998). It is well known that to avoid competition plants may differ in the pollinators they recruit and so have independent pollen vectors (Heinrich 1976, Pleasants 1980, Rathcke 1988.…”

Indirect interactions between crops and natural vegetation through flower visitors: the importance of temporal as well as spatial spillover

“…We surveyed flower visitor-flower interactions in the plots in each transect once a month from June − October 2013, with an additional survey in January 2014 (yielding 6 months of surveys) between 08h00 and 15h00, to allow us to capture variability in flower visitor assemblages over space and time (Baldock et al, 2011;Stone et al, 1998). Surveys were conducted on warm, windless days.…”

Reproductive biology of Davilla kunthii A. St-Hil. (Dilleniaceae) in Central Amazonia

“…According to these authors, many visitors can be included in functional groups, which permit the understanding of specialisation as adaptive evolution. Other ways to understand the same phenomenon refer to time of anthesis (Armbruster 1985;Stone et al 1998), location of pollen deposition (Nilsson 1987;Armbruster et al 1994), or even homoplasies of fl oral traits (Schemske 1981;Nilsson 1983;Temeles & Kress 2003 …”