Parties as pay-off seekers: Pre-electoral coalitions in a patronage democracy

Hendrawan, Adrianus; Berenschot, Ward; Aspinall, Edward

doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102238

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Model koalisi Office-seeking merupakan penggabungan beberapa partai politik dengan pertimbangan ingin mendapatkan kekuasaan atau jabatan-jabatan strategis dalam sebuah kepemerintahan. Sedangkam koalisi model policy-seeking mendasarkan pertimbangan penggabungan beberapa partai politik karena mempertimbangkan keselarasan kebijakan partai, kesamaan ideologi dan program kegiatan partai politik (Prastya et al, 2021) Di Indonesia, orientasi koalisi lintas partai politik dalam Pilkada langsung cenderung bersifat Office-seeking, yang pembentukan koalisi berdasarkan pertimbangan pragmatis seperti memburu jabatan, uang dan kekuasaan, tidak memperhatikan kesamaan ideologi ataupun platform partai, serta bersifat jangka pendek (Ekawati, 2019;Hendrawan et al, 2021;Nadir, 2013;Romli, 2017;Tjahjoko, 2015). Sealin itu, pembentukan koalisi model Office-seeking cenderung bersifat incidental (adh occoalition), yang pembentukannya terikat pada suatu agenda politik tertentu.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Orientasi Pembentukan Koalisi dan Fragmentasi Kepentingan dalam Penentuan Calon Wakil Bupati Ende Sisa Masa Jabatan 2019-2023

Leda

2023

JEHSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to describe the orientation of forming a coalition of parties supporting the MJ Package in the 2018 Pilkada, the rivalry of the coalition party elites when fighting for the position of Deputy Regent of Ende, along with the various political interests behind the rivalry that occurred. In order to approach this problem, references to the theory and concept of the Office-seeking coalition are used. This study uses a qualitative descriptive research method. Research data was collected through interviews, documentation, triangulation and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study conclude that the orientation of the coalition formed in the MJ Package winning coalition in the 2018 Pilkada is an office-seeking coalition that tends to be pragmatic, considering the electability and popularity of the candidates. Coalitions in the form of office seeking create coalition configurations that are easily fragile, fragmented and conflictual, as evidenced by the differences in attitudes and political interests in determining the candidates for Deputy Regent of Ende for the remainder of the 2019-2023 term. The elite battle behind differences in elite attitudes occurs because political party elites are not a single, apolitical entity but are fragmented into various interest factions both internally and externally.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Orientasi Pembentukan Koalisi dan Fragmentasi Kepentingan dalam Penentuan Calon Wakil Bupati Ende Sisa Masa Jabatan 2019-2023

Leda

2023

JEHSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No obstante, ofrecen escaso poder explicativo donde los márgenes de victoria son amplios o cuando se unen partidos con ideologías opuestas, donde se forman las denominadas alianzas antihegemónicas. 3 Éstas encuentran mejor respaldo teórico en las investigaciones generadas en entornos hegemónicos o autoritarios, caracterizados por prácticas clientelistas en la dinámica política (Hendrawan et al, 2021) y/o donde subsisten partidos dominantes en el marco de contiendas formalmente democráticas (Kavasoglu, 2022). Factores como la hegemonía, erosión oficialista y ciclo electoral son aspectos clave para su configuración en el contexto subnacional mexicano .…”

Section: Teoría Sobre Las Alianzas Electorales Y Los Casos Negativosunclassified

La ausencia de alianza antihegemónica en la gubernatura del Estado de México

Santiago

Rodríguez

2023

conrec

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Estudios sobre alianzas electorales subrayan a la hegemonía política, erosión y ciclo electoral como determinantes para la generación de alianzas antihegemónicas. No obstante, en elecciones para renovar las gubernaturas aparecen las condiciones enunciadas sin el resultado esperado. ¿Qué factores lo inhiben? Se argumenta que la no concurrencia local, escasas elecciones simultáneas y la nacionalización electoral impiden la formación de este tipo de alianzas. Para probarlo se seleccionó al Estado de México como un ejemplo de caso negativo, y desde un enfoque de estudio de caso se comparó transversal y longitudinalmente. El objetivo es revelar los condicionantes que de forma sistemática inhiben la formación de la alianza antihegemónica. Los hallazgos son el predominio de alianzas oficialistas, la ausencia de cargos para la negociación antihegemónica y mayor dependencia nacional de recursos. Se concluye que el ciclo electoral y la dimensión política de la entidad incrementan la nacionalización de la contienda.

show abstract

“…This process marks the beginning of the transition period because it has entered the stages of the general election. Meanwhile, the schedule and polling day is set for April 17, 2019, where the President's power is in a transitional period until a new leader is inaugurated on October 20, 2019 (Hendrawan et al, 2021). According to the electoral rules in Indonesia, the transferring of the President's power has a time lag of six months because it starts from the registration stage till the day of swearing-in.…”

Section: Toward a Conceptual Of Legal Framework In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

President’s Power, Transition, and Good Governance

Mochtar

Afkar²

2022

BESTUUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><p class="root-block-node">This study aims to analyze the President's power and the threat attached to it during the transition of the inter-election period and the concept of the legal framework in Indonesia's legal system. It also provides the need to be performed in the future to ensure that the President does not abuse this power. The matter raises a series of problems regarding the government's authority during the election transition period. This research will provide comparative studies with Ghana, Liberia, and the United States to understand the President's power in the Indonesian constitutional system. This research was conducted using doctrinal research methods, or normative legal research. In reviewing a legal issue, a doctrinal research method analyzes positive law, related cases, and other relevant references. The results showed that the President's power during the election transition period needs to be regulated in the constitution. Furthermore, the arrangement has to be enforced technically in the form of a presidential transition law.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div>

show abstract

Parties as pay-off seekers: Pre-electoral coalitions in a patronage democracy

Cited by 11 publications

References 25 publications

Orientasi Pembentukan Koalisi dan Fragmentasi Kepentingan dalam Penentuan Calon Wakil Bupati Ende Sisa Masa Jabatan 2019-2023

Orientasi Pembentukan Koalisi dan Fragmentasi Kepentingan dalam Penentuan Calon Wakil Bupati Ende Sisa Masa Jabatan 2019-2023

La ausencia de alianza antihegemónica en la gubernatura del Estado de México

President’s Power, Transition, and Good Governance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About