2001
DOI: 10.1021/la0103315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particles Adsorbed at the Oil−Water Interface:  A Theoretical Comparison between Spheres of Uniform Wettability and “Janus” Particles

Abstract: We consider the adsorption at an oil-water interface of spherical particles of two types. The first type has a homogeneous surface of uniform wettability. The second type, so-called "Janus" particles, has two surface regions of differing wettabilities. Homogeneous particles are strongly surface active but are not amphiphilic, whereas Janus particles are both surface active and amphiphilic. We present calculations to show how the particle amphiphilicity, tuned by variation of either the relative surfaces areas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
564
0
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 545 publications
(592 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
12
564
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the simulation and predicted interaction potentials are likely due to the neglect of capillary waves in the macroscopic theories. 28,27 For D s 0 the free energy profile is asymmetric, with the degree of asymmetry increasing with D. As has been previously noted, 19 despite not being amphiphilic such particles are often surface-active (adhere to the interface). The detachment energies DF A/B (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences between the simulation and predicted interaction potentials are likely due to the neglect of capillary waves in the macroscopic theories. 28,27 For D s 0 the free energy profile is asymmetric, with the degree of asymmetry increasing with D. As has been previously noted, 19 despite not being amphiphilic such particles are often surface-active (adhere to the interface). The detachment energies DF A/B (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Theoretical analysis of a mm-sized Janus particle predicts that the detachment energy is given by 19,43 …”
Section: Symmetric Janus Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative areas of the polar and apolar particle surface regions are parameterized by the angle a. b denotes the immersion angle of the particle at the oil/water interface. 52 Reprinted with permission from The relative areas of the polar and apolar surface regions define the average contact angle (h average ) according to:…”
Section: Janus-type Nanoparticle Assembly At Fluid Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Binks and Fletcher, amphiphilic Janus particles can exhibit an interfacial activity several times higher than simple homogeneous particles. 52 Janus particles combine the amphiphilic character of surfactants and the physical properties of nanoparticles, which opens new opportunities in emerging areas of nanotechnology and emulsions stabilization. Recently, Perro et al 53 reviewed the developments in the field of Janus particles during the last fifteen years, describing various strategies to obtain Janus-type particles using polymer precursors.…”
Section: Janus-type Nanoparticle Assembly At Fluid Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Janus particles, with two sides of distinct compositions or textures, have many potential uses: electronic paper, where one needs to switch between black and white states [4]; optical, chemical or biological biosensors, where the two hemispheres will respond differently to stimuli [5]; anisotropic building blocks for supra-assemblies, allowing a greater variety of novel structures to be built [6]; functional surfactants, where each hemisphere likes or dislikes some other component [7]; or self-motile colloidal particles (swimmers), propelled by the different ways in which either hemisphere interacts with the surrounding medium [8].…”
Section: Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%