2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2958-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm optimization technique for determining optimal machining parameters of different work piece materials in turning operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm has the advantages of good accuracy, fast convergence and easy implementation and is adopted in this article. 18 Each particle represents a set of controller parameters. The algorithm first randomly generates a particle swarm, and the optimisation performance of each particle is evaluated using a multi-objective function.…”
Section: Multi-objective Nonlinear Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm has the advantages of good accuracy, fast convergence and easy implementation and is adopted in this article. 18 Each particle represents a set of controller parameters. The algorithm first randomly generates a particle swarm, and the optimisation performance of each particle is evaluated using a multi-objective function.…”
Section: Multi-objective Nonlinear Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables I and II that the values range from the 10 3 to 10 -2 grades, therefore it is extremely difficult to find one single optimization polynomial that would sufficiently describe all the dependent values f (x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) which are in fact cutting force, surface roughness, and tool life. Several models have been tested, yet the best polynomial that proved to be as accurate as possible for the proposed paper turned out to be composed of ten coefficients that affected the influences of independent variables x 1 , x 2 , and x 3 : (10) where the symbols stand for: f (x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) -output parameters F c (cutting force), R a (surface roughness), or T (tool life), x 1 -cutting speed v c , x 2 -feed rate f, x 3 -cutting depth a p , k 1 , k 2 , …, k 10 -coefficients.…”
Section: Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSO method has been extensively researched by several researchers previously [1][2][3], therefore PSO serves as a good comparison regarding GSA research when determining its accuracy and run parameters, including optimization time. Genetic programming and genetic algorithm approaches are also popular for optimization methods [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using PSO technique .Rao, R. V., Savsani, V. J., and Vakharia, D. P., [10] introduced a new optimization method known as Teaching -Learning Based Optimization (TLBO).This algorithm has not only solved many bench mark design problems and given effective and efficient result compared the result with other non-traditional optimization techniques such as PSO, ACO, SA, GA, etc. Bharti R.S et al [11] suggested the machining performance viz. machining time and surface roughness in CNC machining after conducting experiments on brass, aluminium, copper, and mild steel.…”
Section: Page 250mentioning
confidence: 99%