2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Swarm Optimization for Resource Constrained-project Scheduling Problem with Varying Resource Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Benefits of PSO over other metaheuristic approaches are computational feasibility and effectiveness. PSO shows its uniqueness such as easy implementation and consistency in performance [97].…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits of PSO over other metaheuristic approaches are computational feasibility and effectiveness. PSO shows its uniqueness such as easy implementation and consistency in performance [97].…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-objective linear programming is suggested for optimization when faced with constrained resource problems, including construction costs, project duration, resource idle time, and project delivery time [24]. A particle swarm optimization is also suggested for construction scheduling problems in order to solve resource constraint issues [25]. An ant colony optimization, which focuses on minimizing project duration while varying activity sequences, is another approach for resource-constrained projects [26].…”
Section: Construction Planning and Scheduling Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using PSO algorithm, Joy et al solved resource-constrained project scheduling problem with varying resource levels. The available resources were limited in these problems but the different levels of resources were determined beforehand and the resource levels were not fixed during the whole project (Joy et al , 2016; Elbeltagi et al , 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%