2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.3.024012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle-Support Interferences in Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering from Supported-Catalyst Materials

Abstract: Small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) is a powerful technique for the investigation of catalyst materials at the nanoscale. We present results of an anomalous SAXS study on metal-oxide-supported platinum particles used as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. The scattering interferences between catalyst particles and support material are taken into account qualitatively and quantitatively by a mathematical model for the data-fitting procedure. Our results clearly demonstrate the fundamental importance of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the depression of scattering intensity resulting from the particle-support interference effect gets weaker because of the decreasing difference between support particle size and Pt particle size. 9 The growth of Pt nanoparticles in the course of high-potential cycling is obvious from the log-normal Pt nanoparticle size distributions shown in Figure 6b. The narrow initial distribution at an average diameter ofd 0 = 2.2 nm collapses after the first high-potential cycle and continues to get broader and to shift to larger diameters to reach an average diameter ofd 500 = 4.4 nm after 500 degradation cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the same time, the depression of scattering intensity resulting from the particle-support interference effect gets weaker because of the decreasing difference between support particle size and Pt particle size. 9 The growth of Pt nanoparticles in the course of high-potential cycling is obvious from the log-normal Pt nanoparticle size distributions shown in Figure 6b. The narrow initial distribution at an average diameter ofd 0 = 2.2 nm collapses after the first high-potential cycle and continues to get broader and to shift to larger diameters to reach an average diameter ofd 500 = 4.4 nm after 500 degradation cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in detail in Ref. 9, SAXS curves at four different X-ray energies close to the Pt-L III absorption edge were used in the analysis, and the resulting net Pt signal was fitted with the standard model of spherical Pt particles with log-normal size distribution in combination with the model for the Pt particle-support material scattering interference presented in the same reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 The proportionality factor was obtained from the ratio of the integrated scattering data measured for this glassy carbon sample with our MPD setup and the known differential cross section per area of this sample integrated over the same q-range, the atomic form factor of Pt at the given X-ray energy, n Pt the atomic (number) density of Pt and S Pt (q) the partial structure factor (PSF) of the Pt-NPs. 17 The model of spherical particles was used for the analysis of the net Pt differential cross sections extracted from our experimental data. Within this model, the Pt PSF is given by S Pt (q) = N Pt Due to the absolute normalization of the scattering data to differential cross sections, results from the fit not only allowed to determine the log-normal size distribution of the Pt-NPs P Pt (R Pt ), but also to assess the absolute number of Pt-NPs per electrode area where ρ Pt is the mass density of platinum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the tunability of X-ray photon energy at synchrotron sources enables the use of anomalous SAXS (ASAXS) in order to separate the Pt nanoparticle (Pt-NP) scattering from the background scattering from support material and cell components. 9,17 Despite these advantages, in situ SAXS experiments at synchrotron facilities face the major drawback of highly restricted availability of beamtime. Multi-purpose laboratory X-ray diffractometers represent an attractive alternative to perform electrochemical in situ SAXS experiments due to their widespread availability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%