2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size effect on the dielectric properties of ZnO nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experimental results, we attain one semicircle, which concludes that maximum conduction is through grain boundary in all Ni 1−x Zn x Fe 2 O 4 samples [73,80]. Moreover, it may occur also due to transport of charge carriers, conduction band overlapping in bulk, or electrode interfaces [52,81]. The oxygen stoichiometry also significantly affects the electric, magnetic, or magnetoelectric properties of nanoferrites, hexaferrites, and complex oxides [24,82].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In our experimental results, we attain one semicircle, which concludes that maximum conduction is through grain boundary in all Ni 1−x Zn x Fe 2 O 4 samples [73,80]. Moreover, it may occur also due to transport of charge carriers, conduction band overlapping in bulk, or electrode interfaces [52,81]. The oxygen stoichiometry also significantly affects the electric, magnetic, or magnetoelectric properties of nanoferrites, hexaferrites, and complex oxides [24,82].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The deviation from the linearities of MS plots could be due to the presence of large concentration surface states of the sample and the surface roughness of the nanoparticle thin film. The donor density of pure ZnO and Co-doped ZnO nanoparticles was estimated using the dielectric constant 3.8 reported for 22 nm sized ZnO NPs . As seen in Figure c, the donor density of doped zinc oxide gradually increases with doping compared to pure zinc oxide, and this could be due to cobalt ions reducing or passivating defects, which leads to larger carrier densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The donor density of pure ZnO and Co-doped ZnO nanoparticles was estimated using the dielectric constant 3.8 reported for 22 nm sized ZnO NPs. 65 As seen in Figure 9c, the donor density of doped zinc oxide gradually increases with doping compared to pure zinc oxide, and this could be due to cobalt ions reducing or passivating defects, which leads to larger carrier densities. A further increase in doping will create cobalt-based defects, which will reduce the carrier density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, this value has to be screened, and very different values of the dielectric constant ε s can be found in the literature. For bulk ZnO ε s = 8–10 , but it can range from 5 to 50 for nanoparticles, depending on their size. Hence, the screened values of U could range between 2ω 0 and 15ω 0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%