2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size analysis by an automated dynamometer method integrated with an x-y sample changer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods of determining particle size distribution used in soil science laboratories are for example the organoleptic method, the Atterberg Limits Test, photosedimentation Minerals 2021, 11, 465 2 of 10 methods, x-ray method, electrical sensing zone method (the Coulter principle), photon correlation spectroscopy [16], static and dynamic image analysis [17,18], as well as automated scanning electron microscopy [19]. New methods have also been developed, for example, the dynamometer method [20] and integral suspension pressure method (Pario) [21]. Lastly, there is the ever more widely used laser diffraction method (LDM) [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods of determining particle size distribution used in soil science laboratories are for example the organoleptic method, the Atterberg Limits Test, photosedimentation Minerals 2021, 11, 465 2 of 10 methods, x-ray method, electrical sensing zone method (the Coulter principle), photon correlation spectroscopy [16], static and dynamic image analysis [17,18], as well as automated scanning electron microscopy [19]. New methods have also been developed, for example, the dynamometer method [20] and integral suspension pressure method (Pario) [21]. Lastly, there is the ever more widely used laser diffraction method (LDM) [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment bulk density, natural weighting moisture, and maximum molecular moisture capacity were determined using the Litvinov field laboratory [17]. The sediment sample mechanical components are based on particle size analysis using sieve, aerometric, and pipette methods [18,19]. To determine the mechanical composition of the cover sediments, the following fraction sizes were measured (in mm): coarse gravel 7-5, fine gravel 5-2; sand is very coarse 2-1, coarse 1-0.5, medium 0.5-0.25, fine 0.25-0.10, fine-grained 0.10-0.05, dust 0.05-0.005; clay < 0.005.…”
Section: Field Measurements Sampling and Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome some limitations, several automated measuring instruments have been introduced: The “Sedimat” (Umwelt‐Geräte‐Technik GmbH, Müncheberg Germany) automatizes both, homogenization and the pipetting. Sedimentation scales (Kovács et al., 2004), distance ranging sensors (Murad et al., 2020), or dynamic weighting of a float (Kaszubkiewicz et al., 2020; Papuga et al, 2018) enable electronical reading of hydrometers. Alternatively, the hydrometric pressure of the suspension at a given depth can be measured directly (Durner et al., 2017; Kovács et al., 2004; Zhang & Tumay, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%