2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.99.043109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle-shape-, temperature-, and concentration-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids

Abstract: In this study, using the Green-Kubo-method-based molecular dynamics simulations, correlations for predicting the thermophysical properties of nanofluids are developed based on particle shape, fluid temperature, and volume concentration. Silver nanofluids with various nanoparticle shapes including spheres, cubes, cylinders, and rectangular prisms are investigated. The numerical study is conducted within the concentration range 0.14-1.4 vol % and temperature range 280-335 K. The relative thermal conductivity and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To exemplify the influence of nanoparticle shape, Figure 5a shows the results obtained with three different nanoparticle shapes in a TiO 2 water-based nanofluid [15]: cubic, rod and spherical. Passing from cubic to spherical nanoparticles, the thermal conductivity significantly enhances by around 20% at 303 K up to around 60% at 353 K. The authors suggest this result is related to the different surface to volume ratios for the different shapes, as highlighted also by [47], which enhance the heat transfer. At the same time, viscosity is also influenced by nanoparticle shape.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Shapementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To exemplify the influence of nanoparticle shape, Figure 5a shows the results obtained with three different nanoparticle shapes in a TiO 2 water-based nanofluid [15]: cubic, rod and spherical. Passing from cubic to spherical nanoparticles, the thermal conductivity significantly enhances by around 20% at 303 K up to around 60% at 353 K. The authors suggest this result is related to the different surface to volume ratios for the different shapes, as highlighted also by [47], which enhance the heat transfer. At the same time, viscosity is also influenced by nanoparticle shape.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Shapementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides size, the shape of nanoparticles is another morphological aspect that can influence the properties of nanofluids. Some studies are available in the literature showing this effect on thermal conductivity and viscosity [15,17,47]. To exemplify the influence of nanoparticle shape, Figure 5a shows the results obtained with three different nanoparticle shapes in a TiO2 water-based nanofluid [15]: cubic, rod and spherical.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCM is also combined by nanoparticle [26][27][28][29], heat pipe [13], fin, and mesh [30,31] because of its thermal properties. The concept of PCM for battery cooling was initially used by Al-Hallaj and Selman [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most LHTES suffers low efficiency of the thermal storage because of the low thermal conductivity of the PCMs [21,26]. The main thermo-physical properties of PCMs, including thermal conductivity and latent heat, highly affect the performance of the LHTES [27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of techniques have been utilized by researchers to increase efficiency enhancements of PCMs. Adding highly thermally conductive particles [32], nanomaterials [31,[33][34][35], fins [36], and heat pipes [37][38][39] are some examples of tools used to improve the thermal conductivity of the medium. Heat pipe systems have been widely used in various energy storage and heat transfer systems because of their suitability in the role of heat delivery and passive operation [40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%