2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001wr000746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle shape characterization using angle of repose measurements for predicting the effective permittivity and electrical conductivity of saturated granular media

Abstract: [1] The particle shape of sediments, soils, and rocks affects the packing of the material and the subsequent pore geometry; it therefore influences important transport properties, such as electrical conductivity, dielectric permittivity, diffusion coefficient, thermal conductivity, and hydraulic conductivity. It is difficult to quantify the ''average'' shape characteristics of a granular material so a method, which would capture the threedimensional shape characteristics of a granular material in regards to it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grain shapes of sediments, soils, and rocks affect the packing of the material and the resulting pore geometries. They influence important transport properties, such as electrical conductivity, dielectric permittivity, diffusion, thermal conductivity, and hydraulic conductivity [22]. The stress distribution in a sandpile of shape-anisotropic ('anisometric') particles is very different from that in a pile of spherical grains, owing particularly to orientation effects [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain shapes of sediments, soils, and rocks affect the packing of the material and the resulting pore geometries. They influence important transport properties, such as electrical conductivity, dielectric permittivity, diffusion, thermal conductivity, and hydraulic conductivity [22]. The stress distribution in a sandpile of shape-anisotropic ('anisometric') particles is very different from that in a pile of spherical grains, owing particularly to orientation effects [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although should physically vary with sediment properties (size, shapes, angularity, packing density) and condition (degree of saturation, immersed or dry) (Friedman andRobinson, 2002, Carrigy, 1970), no analytical formulation exists that links all these properties and conditions to . For example, experimental studies of Miller and Byrne (1966, Table I, pg 307) and Carrigy (1970, Table V, pg157) show that average for quartz sand is around and increases by an order of 1% for sand submerged in water.…”
Section: Measured Transport Versus Predicted Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these m values is supported by experimental data on sphere-like and cylindrical inclusions. Several authors (among others, Atkins and Smith, 1961, Jackson et al, 1978, Friedman and Robinson, 2002 made experiments on natural sands and found m values close to 1.5 for reported sphericity values ranging from 0.73 to 0.83. Their results compare well with the Bussian's predictions for non-conducting particles and m values of 1.5 (Figure 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If non-spherical (oblate or prolate) particles have some preferential alignment, the soil becomes anisotropic and its resistivity depends on the direction in which it is measured. Several authors examined the effect of particle shape and/or orientation on the electrical properties of the material, through laboratory investigation (Willye, 1953;Atkins and Smith, 1961;Jackson et al, 1978;Kujiper et al, 1996;Friedman and Robinson, 2002) or theoretical models (Sen et al, 1981;Mendelson and Cohen, 1982;Bussian, 1983;Kuijper et al, 1996;Zimmerman, 1996). About the influence of the particle shape, the main conclusion is that the mixture resistivity generally increases when particles are elongated, for both 2D or 3D, leading to higher values of the cementation exponent m. As mentioned before, theoretical works highlighted that m is higher in 2D than in 3D, showing the higher sensitivity of resistivity to porosity (or particle concentration) in 2D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%