2018
DOI: 10.1017/hpl.2018.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle-in-cell simulations of laser–plasma interactions at solid densities and relativistic intensities: the role of atomic processes

Abstract: Direct studies of intense laser-solid interactions is still of great challenges, because of the many coupled physical mechanisms, such as direct laser heating, ionization dynamics, collision among charged particles, and electrostatic or electromagnetic instabilities, to name just a few. Here, we present a full particle-in-cell simulation (PIC) framework, which enables us to calculate laser-solid interactions in a "first principle" way, covering almost "all" the coupled physical mechanisms. Apart from the mecha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the recently developed PIC code LAPINS 79 , 80 , which is able to simulate intense beam-plasma interaction in a self-consistent way, which contains both close collisions and collective electromagnetic fields (see details in “Methods”). The simulation assumes, the incident proton beam to have Gaussian distribution in space and time, with a beam duration of 1 ps and a transverse extension of 1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the recently developed PIC code LAPINS 79 , 80 , which is able to simulate intense beam-plasma interaction in a self-consistent way, which contains both close collisions and collective electromagnetic fields (see details in “Methods”). The simulation assumes, the incident proton beam to have Gaussian distribution in space and time, with a beam duration of 1 ps and a transverse extension of 1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of the collisional ionization can be also estimated by similar way. The cross-section of the collisional ionization for the relativistic electrons is σ ci 2 7/2 π 1/2 /3 Z 2 α·r 2 e L, where L is the Coulomb logarithm [38]. Even for very large value of L = 20 the number of electrons produced via collisional ionization N e,ci = n e N i cσ ci τ c 0.016 is much less than the number of the electrons created via field ionization N e N i > 10 4 in the cascade volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm the above theoretical predictions, we have used LAPINS code (Chen et al 2020;Ren et al 2020;Wu et al 2018Wu et al , 2020 to make multiple sets of 2D3V simulations of a proton beam propagating in a uniform large-scale hydrogen plasma. As we know for typical particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, the plasma frequency needs to be resolved, and moreover the grid size must be comparable to the Debye length to minimize artificial In the 30 sets of simulations run by LAPINS code, the values of the proton beam density (in units of n 0 ) and velocity (in units of the light speed c ≈ 3.0 × 10 8 m s −1 ).…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 93%