2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle control study towards burning plasma control in JT-60U

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the SMBI yields comparable penetration depth of the deposited fuel as fueling scheme using the injection of pellets. Nowadays the SMBI have been widely applied to many tokamak devices such as HL-2A [11], KSTAR [12], W7-AS [13], JT-60U [14], and EAST [15]. Furthermore, the construction cost of the SMBI system is less than that of the PI system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the SMBI yields comparable penetration depth of the deposited fuel as fueling scheme using the injection of pellets. Nowadays the SMBI have been widely applied to many tokamak devices such as HL-2A [11], KSTAR [12], W7-AS [13], JT-60U [14], and EAST [15]. Furthermore, the construction cost of the SMBI system is less than that of the PI system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the dissociation and ionization processes, the fueling efficiency is expected to also depend on different fueling techniques. Pellet injection is expected to have the highest fueling efficiency with an ablation process to allow a deeper position for dissociation and ionization process, as shown by the experimental results (Takenaga et al 2009). The fueling efficiency for SMBI is lower than that for pellet injection but higher than GP because the directed motion of the SMB with high velocity enables a higher proportion of Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fueling Efficiency Between Different Fueling T...mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because SMBI has a higher fueling efficiency than GP under different regimes, it could assume the role of GP in fusion devices. Because of its good performance and further optimization in the future (Yao et al 2004(Yao et al , 2007Pegourie et al 2003;Zheng et al 2013;Lang et al 2005;Soukhanovskii et al 2004;Takenaga et al 2009;Kim et al 2013;Murakami et al 2012;Mizuuchi et al 2010;Xiao et al 2014aXiao et al , 2021Yao and Baldzuhn 1933;Tanna et al 2019;Islam et al 2016), SMBI might play a pivotal Fig. 11 Fueling efficiencies of the SMBI system and GP in different plasma discharge regimes (Yuan et al 2018) role under a variety of conditions for future fusion devices, such as the start-up phase and pellet-free injection of helium discharge.…”
Section: Smbi Fueling Efficiency In Different Confinement Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar analyses are done in some researchers; e.g., the current drive simulation with the measurement of current profile peaking factor [4], the current drive and control simulation in ITER [5,6], the density profile control analysis in ASDEX [7]. The plasma burn control simulation is done in JT-60U [8][9][10] and in Ref [11]. In most of these researches, they control one parameter with one actuator for moderate performance plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%