1996
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.217-222.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Collisions and Inclusion Removal in Molten Aluminium: A Numerical Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single-humped form of solution is seen to persist for small times, with the position of the hump staying almost static, the distribution becoming smaller in amplitude as mass is lost from the system, and much broader as aggregation creates clusters of larger sizes. This is in agreement with the numerical results of Gudmundsson for a system modelling the evolution under agglomeration of an initially single-humped distribution of TiB 2 particles in molten aluminium [12,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The single-humped form of solution is seen to persist for small times, with the position of the hump staying almost static, the distribution becoming smaller in amplitude as mass is lost from the system, and much broader as aggregation creates clusters of larger sizes. This is in agreement with the numerical results of Gudmundsson for a system modelling the evolution under agglomeration of an initially single-humped distribution of TiB 2 particles in molten aluminium [12,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The exact solutions given in Section 2 did not have the form observed in the numerical simulations of Gudmundsson (see Gudmundsson [12] and Gudmundsson et al [18]). One reason for this may be the differences in the kernel used; in numerical work, Gudmundsson used the more accurate kernel a i,j = 2 + (i/j) 1/3 + (j/i) 1/3 for Brownian coagulation, whereas the theory of Section 2 considered the simpler kernels a i,j = a, a i,j = a(i + j).…”
Section: Match To Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Individual particles of TiB 2 have typically a size between 0.5 and 2 lm but some reach 10 lm. Agglomeration of particles increases with increasing residence time in the melt and worsens in the presence of halide salt traces [16,17] although recent studies have shown that Mg additions reduce the agglomeration and increase nucleation efficiency in Al-Si alloys. [18] The coarse TiB 2 particles and agglomerates are a serious concern and can cause surface defects, especially if the aluminum is to be rolled in thin foils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boron content measurement, assuming it corresponds to the level of TiB 2 , showed a~30 pct reduction after 8 minutes of degassing. Gudmundsson [5,8] and Chu [4] also reported loss of TiB 2 during degassing. However, Ar-Cl 2 gas was used in their experiments, and both suggested that Cl led to the formation of TiB 2 agglomerates and thus a loss of refinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The grain refiner is normally added to the melt immediately prior to or during degassing, because the stirring motion helps to distribute the grain refining particles throughout the melt. However, it has been reported in the literature [4][5][6][7] that grain refining particles are removed during degassing. Khorasani [6] investigated the effect of degassing with Ar, N, or a mixture of the two on A356 grain refined with an Al-5 wt pct-1 wt pct B master alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%