1991
DOI: 10.1039/ft9918701371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle adhesion in model systems. Part 13.—Theory of multilayer deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a colloidal dispersion is continuously injected into a granular porous matrix, the colloid deposition rate is susceptible to temporal variations depending on the nature of the particleparticle and particle-collector interactions (3,6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). For a stable suspension of mutually repulsive colloidal particles, the colloid deposition rate generally decreases as the collector surfaces are increasingly covered by the deposited particles, a phenomenon known as blocking (6,9,10,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When a colloidal dispersion is continuously injected into a granular porous matrix, the colloid deposition rate is susceptible to temporal variations depending on the nature of the particleparticle and particle-collector interactions (3,6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). For a stable suspension of mutually repulsive colloidal particles, the colloid deposition rate generally decreases as the collector surfaces are increasingly covered by the deposited particles, a phenomenon known as blocking (6,9,10,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Secondly, few-layer deposition processes have been of interest in some experimental systems. Mean-field theories of multilayer deposition with particle size and interactions accounted for were formulated [76] and used to fit such data [12,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Deposition With Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the latter paper and by Rajagopalan and Chu 181, it is possible to reinterpret such models to describe the reduction in attachment rate associated with the covering of filter grain surfaces. Privman et al [9] dealt with this phenomenon explicitly. Song and Elimelech [lo] extended this work by introducing an internal variable which describes the time evolution of the surface covering.…”
Section: *Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (3a) does not allow for this or for the detachment phenomenon. It is the idealized pure attachment model proposed by Iwasaki [3] and extended to account for grain covering by Privman et al [9].…”
Section: Quasistatic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%