2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory noise mapping works! An evaluation of participatory sensing as an alternative to standard techniques for environmental monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
137
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have tried to formulate a better traffic model by using dynamic noise mapping techniques [4,5] or even data extracted from participatory noise mapping techniques [6,7]. Moreover, the need to combine a holistic approach in environmental noise policy -by combining the noise mapping with the soundscape approach -has recently been raised by the European Environmental Agency (EEA) in the Good Practice Guide on Quiet Areas [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have tried to formulate a better traffic model by using dynamic noise mapping techniques [4,5] or even data extracted from participatory noise mapping techniques [6,7]. Moreover, the need to combine a holistic approach in environmental noise policy -by combining the noise mapping with the soundscape approach -has recently been raised by the European Environmental Agency (EEA) in the Good Practice Guide on Quiet Areas [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, mobiles phones emerged as a potential solution for the participatory noise monitoring; this approach was proposed by D'Hondt et al in [14] and Kanjo in [15]. However, processing capabilities and power consumption of smartphones far exceed that of sensor nodes, which does not make them a viable solution for long-term noise pollution monitoring.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, focus in existing solutions e.g., (Rana et al, 2010;D'Hondt et al, 2013;Bennett et al, 2010) is mostly on noise measurement itself, especially in terms of sensor calibration or measurement/maps accuracy and quality while work remains to be done in order to properly represent the results to users so as to increase their awareness of their surrounding environment pollution, which can be a major harming factor to their well-being.…”
Section: Noise Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%