2004
DOI: 10.1080/0790062042000206101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory irrigation management in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, based on the revealed weaknesses and strengths, recommendations are made to improve functioning of the institutions and their outcomes. In most studies concerning the functioning of irrigation management performance, simple indicators are used (Lam, 2001;Malano et al, 2004;Yildirim & Cakmak, 2004;Kadiri et al, 2009). Such indicators, however, do not reveal the reasons for good or bad performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thirdly, based on the revealed weaknesses and strengths, recommendations are made to improve functioning of the institutions and their outcomes. In most studies concerning the functioning of irrigation management performance, simple indicators are used (Lam, 2001;Malano et al, 2004;Yildirim & Cakmak, 2004;Kadiri et al, 2009). Such indicators, however, do not reveal the reasons for good or bad performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another challenge which is also gender related concerns limited participation in the management process by women. As observed in Turkey by Yildirim and Çakmak (2004), women's participation in irrigation management at West Kano is nil. For instance, members of the WUA are distributed as shown in Table II.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Imtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholder participation is the main focus of IMT, hence it is sometimes referred to as participatory irrigation management; see e.g. Samad and Vermillion (1999) and Yildirim and Çakmak (2004).…”
Section: The Concept Of Imtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps the most common adjustment to the failures of top-down management to achieve its objectives was the creation of Water Users Associations (WUAs) to enable farmers to participate in the operations and maintenance of local irrigation systems (among many others: Attia, 2005;Yildirim & Cakmak, 2004;Salman et al, 2008; and Supplement 3 to Volume 58 of Irrigation and Drainage, 2009). Water-use efficiency typically increases by 30 to 50 percent with WUAs, and the energy used for pumping is cut in half or even more Water Governance in the Middle East and North Africa 149 (Attia, 2005;Doukali, 2005).…”
Section: Where Gains Are Being Madementioning
confidence: 99%