SJPS 2021
DOI: 10.34135/sjps.210205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation of Citizens in Public Financial Decision-Making in Serbia

Abstract: Participation in the local public finance decision-making process in Serbia is not a new concept as it was implemented even during the ‘Titoistic’ period. However, direct participation is still in an infant phase altogether with the low interest of citizens in participating in local financial decision-making procedures. The aim of this paper is to explain the main types of civic participation in the local financial decision-making process (i.e., referendum voting on self-imposed contribution, participatory bud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more tactful approach to our respondents would be a hard copy (Paper-And-Pencil Inter-viewing) approach. Nonetheless, the main rationale behind the use of an electronic rather than a hard copy questionnaire was not time or cost efficiency [49], but rather momentum. The data was collected in the aftermath of the third COVID-19 wave, and this was the safest means of data collection.…”
Section: Research Instrument Variables and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more tactful approach to our respondents would be a hard copy (Paper-And-Pencil Inter-viewing) approach. Nonetheless, the main rationale behind the use of an electronic rather than a hard copy questionnaire was not time or cost efficiency [49], but rather momentum. The data was collected in the aftermath of the third COVID-19 wave, and this was the safest means of data collection.…”
Section: Research Instrument Variables and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Šabovic, Milosavljević and Benković (2021) deal with citizens as another critical stakeholder in the PB process, and they look at their will to participate. Based on the analysis of the dominant participation models in the local financial decision-making process (self-imposed contribution, PB, and civic crowdfunding), their data suggest that there are two main factors that explain low participation: a lack of knowledge about participation in financial decision-making and a lack of interest in participation.…”
Section: Selected Factors Determining the Scale And Success Of Participatory Budgeting: A Summary Of Findings From This Thematic Issuementioning
confidence: 99%