2011
DOI: 10.11606/rco.v5i11.34790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participação feminina na produção científica em contabilidade publicada nos anais dos eventos Enanpad, Congresso USP de Controladoria e Contabilidade e Congresso Anpcont

Abstract: O estudo analisa a participação feminina na produção científi ca em contabilidade publicada nos anais dos Encontros da Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (EnANPAD), dos Congressos USP de Controladoria e Contabilidade e da Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-graduação em Ciências Contábeis (ANPCONT). Utilizou-se pesquisa documental, com enfoque bibliométrico na Lei de Lotka (BUFREM; PRATES, 2005), baseada nos anais dos eventos. Dentre os 1.294 artigos analisados nos anais da A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
22

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Debates on gender issues have often raised the question of male dominance (Cruz et al, 2018;Estivalete et al, 2018;Silva & Martins, 2017;Vaccari & Beuren, 2017). In this study, female researchers were indeed found to be in quantitative disadvantage, with only 41.2% participation, matching the findings of Morais et al (2016), but not those of other authors focusing on specific areas in accounting (Luca et al, 2011). Our results will hopefully subsidize the current discussion on scientific production and gender in Brazilian academia, considering that, despite the considerable expansion of female access to postgraduate education, women are still underrepresented with regard to authorship (Morais et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Debates on gender issues have often raised the question of male dominance (Cruz et al, 2018;Estivalete et al, 2018;Silva & Martins, 2017;Vaccari & Beuren, 2017). In this study, female researchers were indeed found to be in quantitative disadvantage, with only 41.2% participation, matching the findings of Morais et al (2016), but not those of other authors focusing on specific areas in accounting (Luca et al, 2011). Our results will hopefully subsidize the current discussion on scientific production and gender in Brazilian academia, considering that, despite the considerable expansion of female access to postgraduate education, women are still underrepresented with regard to authorship (Morais et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…The male sex was highly predominant among the authors (74.3%). Luca et al (2011) looked at female participation in accounting studies published in the proceedings of three major Brazilian specialized events and found that 58.3% of the articles were produced or co-produced by women, but also noted a reduction in female participation in the annual proceedings of the Meeting of the National Association of Graduate Study and Research in Management (EnAnpad) between 2007 and 2009.…”
Section: Female Participation In Scientific Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Já a Lei de Bradford mensura a produtividade das revistas e sua relação com determinados temas da literatura acadêmica, evidenciando assim o núcleo de periódicos que evidenciam mais este assunto (Cardoso, Mendonça, Riccio & Sakata, 2005). E a Lei de Zipf mensura a ocorrência de palavras-chave no texto, sendo que a frequência dessas palavras-chave dão embasamento para se saber qual tema é enfatizado neste texto (De Luca, Gomes, Corrêa & Domingos, 2011).…”
Section: Procedimentos Metodológicosunclassified